Double Platinum Member - 100 or more posts
|
Likely to cause foaming and thicken oil, so cannot see point, as with most aftermarket additives. Just buy a better oil at right grade for your use.
|
| |
|
Platinum Member - 50 or more posts
|
Quit with the hearsay. I haven't seen it cause foaming. But, it will thicken the oil. Some people like the Valvoline/STP/Lucas/motorhoney oil thickeners. I don't care for them. If you need a thicker oil, step up one weight!
Signature: Check your tire pressure, drive slow, and use less gas. Screw OPEC!
|
| |
|
Double Platinum Member - 100 or more posts
|
Agree . It will NOT cause foaming of the oil it's added too . Using it in devices sealed with certain types sealants or using certain aerosol products around same will cause foaming though . If you have an oil burner just use a step thicker oil like the above recomendation .
|
| |
|
Double Platinum Member - 100 or more posts
|
In a worst case scenario with thick oils (when not required) is that you will experience air entrainment and cavitation inside the bearings at high RPM. http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/images/lucas/lucas.htmHappy to be convinced otherwise as "thick" oils are used in UK.
|
| |
|
Bronze Member - 1 or more posts
|
quote: Originally posted by surpera1: i used it in my 95 isuzu 3.2 dohc and it really calmed down some valve train noise.
I am curious as to what viscosity was the oil that you added the Lucas to?
|
| |
| Posts: 9 | Location: Clovis, CA | Registered: Wed January 18 2006 |    |
|
Premium Member - 250 or more posts
|
I do believe Purolator is a good filter, but stopped using them because in Ford applications, most purolators do not have the Ford-preferred (as evidenced by the Motorcraft filter design) threaded end bypass valve. I am going over to use Wix filters exclusively. BTW, Purolator (or the parent company, can't remember which) was just sold, so we will have to see how the quality holds up.
As for high mileage oils, they can be a sham, but I believe it gives the oil company an excuse to offer an oil that is not constrained by the energy conserving and starburst requirements, most of which are not oriented to engine protection, but to fuel savings for the auto companies to avoid fines. To me, it's a great option.
|
| |
| Posts: 350 | Location: Detroit, Michigan | Registered: Thu January 08 2004 |    |
|