
|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
|
Level 5 - 501 to 1000 posts |
Keep up will ya? Buster mentioned on Feb. 24th in this thread. Not sure what this has to do with anything, other than I am more qualified to speak about AMSOIL and synthetic oils more than most. This is a thread about AMSOIL and had a lot of incorrect Buster data in it. Just trying to keep it factual here. I'm still waiting for proof of hype and wild outrageous claims you guys say AMSOIL makes. Looks to me like they have plenty of proof to support their claims without hype. And no complaints from other oil companies, consumer groups and government agencies seem to support this. This message has been edited. Last edited by: Tim Vipond, |
|||
|
|
Level 3 - 101 to 250 posts |
Tim, I think you miss a lot of the points being made and give Amsoil dealers a bad name.
It's been acknowledged that Amsoil makes good oils. You seem to selectively choose what you want to hear. What I am saying is that the additive companies and base oil suppliers are the real drivers of the industry, not Amsoil. With out these companies, there is no Amsoil. Amsoil has been a pioneer in the passenger car synthetic motor oil market. Amsoil is a successful blender, but has not always made the best oils on the market. At various times over the course of 30+ years, Mobil 1 has been better and so have other synthetics. Just because Amsoil designs a long drain oil, doesn't mean it will excel in every situation. I don't think there is a "best" oil. Oils change with time, and most probably reverse engineer competitors products. Most oils that meet the same specifications, will perform similarly. Most use similar additives. A lot of it is marketing. And as I said before, unless you have access to all the engine sequence tests, you can only tell so much about an oil. |
|||
|
|
Level 3 - 101 to 250 posts |
|
|||
|
|
Level 3 - 101 to 250 posts |
This message has been edited. Last edited by: Buster, |
|||
|
|
Level 3 - 101 to 250 posts |
I do think Amsoil is making better oils now then they were before. There is no doubt in my mind they have improved a lot.
|
|||
|
|
Level 5 - 501 to 1000 posts |
But without a blender to put the best base oils together with the best additive packages to make the best performing oils with the best warranty, they are not as useful by themselves. This is what AMSOIL does and why they lead the synthetic oil market today in performance and warranty and are still "The First in Synthetics". AMSOIL drives them to make better additives and base oils if they want AMSOIL's business. When has any other company made better synthetic products than AMSOIL. Proof of your statement, please. This message has been edited. Last edited by: Tim Vipond, |
|||
|
|
Level 3 - 101 to 250 posts |
All things considered, Mobil 1 has been better overall. It "officially" meeting more specifications worldwide. In racing, Amsoil certainly hasn't dominated. They finally got serious and now make 3 decent racing oils. (Dominator). Redline makes more grades of racing oils then Amsoil. In Nascar, all the teams use custom blended oils made specifically for racing.
|
|||
|
|
Level 3 - 101 to 250 posts |
I think Amsoil makes the best extended drain oils right now. Mainly their SSO.
|
|||
|
|
Level 5 - 501 to 1000 posts |
AMSOIL doesn't market internationally, but they make oil that meet all required specifications for vehicles in the US and Canada. AMSOIL has dominated in racing. What do you think 3 time Indianapolis 500 Champion racing legend Bobby Unser used? He is the undisputed king of the Pikes Peak International Hill Climb with 13 wins using AMSOIL. 35 Indy car wins. Domination in Snowmobile Racing. Domination in Powerboat racing with multitime world champions Teague and Rinker. Domination in off road truck racing. Doing very well in AMA motorcycle racing. All using off the shelf AMSOIL oil. No special blends needed. Not bad for a small family owned American synthetic oil company. They regularly beat the international mega corporation oil companies in these events. This message has been edited. Last edited by: Tim Vipond, |
|||
|
|
Level 3 - 101 to 250 posts |
Not bad for a small company. Redline has been far more successful in racing than Amsoil for a small blender.
Mobil 1 dominates the market. |
|||
|
|
Level 3 - 101 to 250 posts |
"Keep up, will ya?"
I most humbly, sincerely and undeservedly beg your pardon, Oh Great Tim, Patron Saint of Tribology. (Or are you a god? Certainly in your own mind you seem to be.) The problem is, after the first few lines of any of your posts my eyes glaze over, roll back in my head and it all just becomes more blah, blah, blah... It is possible to write on technical topics without being soporific. An important technique in this regard is to avoid repetition, except when it is used as a bridge to the next aspect of the discussion. Get off the treadmill! In addition to arguing like my ex-wife, you stay on message like a Bush acolyte. Further, I have a subtle yet critical distinction to make; my question was when were YOU going to reveal that you have a dog in this fight? Shall I assume that in the absence of Buster's comment, this discussion would be absent that rather significant fact? All of the lies you've heard about me are true |
|||
|
|
Level 3 - 101 to 250 posts |
Buster - Re: diesters & PAO; The reason diesters remained as a fraction (typically 10-15%) of PAO-based fluid lubes is not because diesters have any superior properties as a basestock in piston engine oils. Their purpose in those applications not as a basestock but as a cosolvent.
There's a lot of horn-tooting about the advantages of PAOs with regard to oxidative stability & VI, but I hear very little mentioned about their Achilles heel, solvency. You might be able to keep a turbine oil adpak (~1%) in solution without a cosolvent, but I wouldn't even risk that. As good as PAOs are at oxidative stability is about how poor they are with regard to solvency, for pretty much the same reasons on the molecular level. So, PAO-based oils require a cosolvent that will hang onto the PAO with the non-polar end while grabbing the (typically) more polar additive with the polar end. Diesters with a hydrocarbon chain length of eight or greater do this adequately. Trimellitates would presumably be better still, but would be cost-prohibitive in a commodity product like gasoline or non-marine diesel engine lube. (Trimellitates can be thought of as "tri-esters".) However, any ester brings along its own downsides. They are more prone to hydrolysis, for one. That's why the leaders have moved to hydrocarbon cosolvents. Last time I checked, Amsoil was still using diesters. All of the lies you've heard about me are true |
|||
|
|
Level 5 - 501 to 1000 posts |
Buster, I'd like to see proof of your statement. AMSOIL is the Official Oil and title sponsor for several professional race series and dominates those. Such as the Traxxas Offroad Championship Racing, AMSOIL Championship Snowmobile Series, AMA Pro Road Racing, Canadian Snocross Racing Association, Rock Maple Racing , AMSOIL World Championship Derby, AMA ATV MX Championship Series, World Championship Powerboat Racing, and others. They have racers in these series that dominate the competition. What professional race series does Red Line have? Who does Red Line have using their products that is equal to racing legend Bobby Unser? Does Mobil1 use off the shelf oil like AMSOIL does? This message has been edited. Last edited by: Tim Vipond, |
|||
|
|
Level 2 - 51 to 100 posts |
Well, Tim ..I'd say that Redline has a better "racing image" as perceived by the public. Buster clearly demonstrates this. While I do not associate Redline with racing, per se~, a good percentage of your average "home equity Jeg's street rod out of a catalog" types treat Redline like it's the "Action Wedge" in P.F. Flyers.
I really have never gotten used to gray haired males driving muscle cars. It just doesn't look right (I'm very gray). |
|||
|
|
Level 5 - 501 to 1000 posts |
Buster seems to have stated a fact. I'm just looking for him to provide facts to back up his claim. I think more likely it is something he made up. I just don't see "far more" Red Line racers beating AMSOIL racers, or sponsoring more races, or selling more oil. He probably has no idea how successful AMSOIL has been in racing over the years. |
|||
|
|
Level 3 - 101 to 250 posts |
what I get out of this.
Amsoil has it's ups and downs. So has everyone else. There is no down side to just being a blender, if it is done right. Who cares who owned ther hydro beds? Lamont is Lamont. His writings are typically spot on. On shills, every MLM has shills. It's the MLMers. Not a slam, just a fact that is seen everywhere. some are more subtle, none are objective. On education, I'm a Civil Engineering guy myself, lot's of diverse experience. But only almost 4 years in oils. Still, creditted in an EPRI paper ain't bad for this stage. (/end brag) I do have my Level III MLA from ICML. Used to be L II, but ISO cert process discovered it was tough enough to re-rate to III. Easiest L III EVER! The L II that enable the auto upgrade SUCKED. Hardest single exam I have ever taken. Tom, you are an Amsoil MLMer. Correct? On Shell, 28 years? Doing what? I suspect it wasn';t all oils, else how did you get to be expert on rocket catalysts? Was any substantial portion of it lubes? Or did that just lay an excellent base for your own efforts? Again, not a slam, I admire anyone who will go out on their own. As to race series sponsorship. So? doesn't mean squat, except you paid for advertising. Surely you don't think every Nascar competitor uses every product from a race name? THAT last, was a slam, BTW. |
|||
|
|
Level 5 - 501 to 1000 posts |
My name is Tim. I am an independent AMSOIL dealer as clearly seen in my profile homepage, meaning I am not an AMSOIL employee and am free to sell any product I want. I also sell Wix, Donaldson, Mann-Hummel filters, Injen Cold Air Intake systems, TRICO wiper blades, NGK plugs and wires, Mother's cleaners, waxes polishes and other products. Yep, 28 years with Shell in chemistry, toxicology, environmental science and rocket catalyst manufacturer and tester. Most in Analytical Chemistry with emphasis on product analysis and method and instrumentation development. Including analytical support of fuels and lubricants. Several years as the technical support "Shell Answer Man" for Solvents and secondary support for lubricants. Shell's US lubricants were formulated and tested in the same R&D center, so had a lot of overlap. Retired from Shell and started my own lubricants business. My 6 year old lubricants business supports 360 accounts now and growing. A requirement of an AMSOIL race sponsorship is to use the AMSOIL products you have agreed to use. As far as I know, that has never been violated. AMSOIL clearly dominates the motorsports racing it supports and sponsors in the US and Canada. Still waiting for Buster's proof that AMSOIL "certainly does not dominate racing" with dozens of National and World Championships, yet Red Line "has been far more successful in racing than AMSOIL". This message has been edited. Last edited by: Tim Vipond, |
|||
|
|
Level 3 - 101 to 250 posts |
Tim, you're so off-base it's comical. It's people like yourself why I avoid Amsoil.
Mobil 1 is used in over 50% of all NASCAR series. Fact. http://online.wsj.com/article/...932274269507173.html http://www.redlineoil.com/motorsports.aspx The last time Amsoil was used in Indy was back when Unser was racing. They are no longer found in Indy. Mobil 1 0w-40 is the most common oil used in Indy and specified by Honda. Mobil 1: http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/...umber=1353523&page=1
Tim, for the longest time Amsoil had NO serious racing oils. They had S2k 0w-30, which they marketed towards racing and long drains, and the one 20w50 racing oil (btw, very few use this heavy of a racing oil these days. Amsoil lagging behind the competition as usual). Amsoil has only recently taken racing seriously now that they have their Dominator racing oil line, which are very good oils. Prior to that they would recommend their 20w50 and S2k 0w-30 oil which were ok. They offer no ultra low viscosity racing oils like Redline, Royal Purple or Mobil 1. Poor Amsoil. This message has been edited. Last edited by: Buster, |
|||
|
|
Level 3 - 101 to 250 posts |
Tim, you are making a fool of yourself. You sell Amsoil though so I'm not surprised.
http://lib.store.yahoo.net/lib...8615989/m1rotech.pdf
|
|||
|
|
Level 3 - 101 to 250 posts |
Another one for ya Timmy.
From Lake Speed. Jr, who works for Joe Gibbs Racing.
No Amsoil in Nascar. The only teams that use Amsoil are the low level teams where people like yourself can fool people into using their oils based on a 4-ball wear test. Comical. From GM Racing:
Need more proof Timmy? |
|||
|
| Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 |
|
Machinery Lubrication | Reliable Plant
Resources: Oil Filter | Motor Oil | Synthetic Oil | Hydraulic Fluid | Hydraulic System Troubleshooting
© Noria Corporation. All Rights Reserved.