Page 1 ... 21 22 23 24
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Gold Member - 25 or more posts
Posted Hide Post
Don't think so much, Alternator. The only good thing you'll get from it, is headache
 
Posts: 33 | Location: Norway | Registered: Mon October 01 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Bronze Member - 1 or more posts
Posted Hide Post
Hi people. I came across this thread today while doing some general research . . . very interesting - enough to sign up here and maybe even offer some service Razz . Quick intro: I'm a mechanical engineer in the research department of a high-tech company. I've been in this field for 27 years, and essentially make my living by developing and/or using high-risk, bleeding edge technology. I'm not a shill, pimp, troll, etc. !
More relevantly, I'm a car nut. My dad is a master mechanic and I've been working on cars since I was a wee lad. My latest project car is a 2001 Honda S2000. This is a marvelous machine. It's F20C engine is a 2.0 liter inline 4, redline is 9,000 rpm, and horsepower is 240hp @ 8600 rpm. The car is most well-known for it's awesome handling though. Also, its only real weakness is a lack of torque down low. As a track car, this is not much of an issue as you are normally up in the rpm power band. This car got moved up twice in SCCA class (I think) because it totally dominated the class where it "should" be. Mine is turbocharged, (Mitsubishi T5-18Z), has methanol/water injection, custom intake, which I installed, modified and/or built from components. I also do the tuning. Its making 330 horsepower to the wheels and 219 ft lbs torque at 3900 rpm. I've been using Mobil 1. Ok enough for the shameless plug about the test subject. Roll Eyes
It's time for an oil change, and here's what I'm willing to do: try Synlube and report on how it goes. I see that there's lots of debate about what/when/ how to test it. I'm no chemical engineer, so what specifically would be the oil analysis test method(s) that would hold merit? Thanks and sorry for the long post.
 
Posts: 4 | Registered: Wed April 02 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Gold Member - 25 or more posts
Posted Hide Post
Hi, Doug.
Here are some details for how to perform a correct analysis of Synlube: http://www.synlube.com/serv02.htm

Another thing that is of great importanse, is to meassure oil temperature, compression and exhaust particles. This should be done before you install Synlube, and after you install it. Perhaps 2 or 3 readings with a 1000-1500 mile interval.
Glad to see that more people are interested in learning more about this great oil.

Looking forward to see your findings, anyway.
 
Posts: 33 | Location: Norway | Registered: Mon October 01 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Bronze Member - 1 or more posts
Posted Hide Post
Thanks Jonny. I hope the skeptics will chime in on any other conditions to check for. I know about general lubrication principles, but not the chemistry. When it comes to the hybrid synthetic oils, I kind of guess they come out of the jet engine oil technology. Commercial jet engine oil lives for 30,000 hours, which would loosely equate to alot of auto miles. Anyways I don't know but I'm interested.
I did email SynLube, asking what I should get for my specific car. He responded back saying I should really check my oil temps first, and asked about my aux oil cooling setup due to the turbo and high engine power. I liked the fact that he didn't just try to sell me stuff first.
 
Posts: 4 | Registered: Wed April 02 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Double Platinum Member - 100 or more posts
Posted Hide Post
That's a difficult question to answer for someone like me that doesn't have an engineering background. I suggest you talk with Miro Kefurt who owns SynLube and get his comments. I feel sure he will give you an honest answer to your questions.

I am wondering about the methanol/water injection system and if that would be a potential trouble spot. SynLube is made of inert ingredients though and if you haven't had problems with other lubes, maybe it's a nonissue.

It would be very interesting if you keep us updated on your discussions with SynLube.
 
Posts: 150 | Location: Atlanta, GA | Registered: Sun August 22 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Bronze Member - 1 or more posts
Posted Hide Post
Thanks - yeah Miro is responding and has provided good info. My water/meth injection is a very moderate level (3gph) and only comes on when intake pressure is over 1psi, when the turbo starts provided boost pressure.
Miro mentioned that for a non OEM turbo setup like mine the Synlube CI would "only" be 50K miles, which is more than good. I only need the Synlube to live for 20.2K miles to break even. I'm not concerned with cost, just interested in the performance.
 
Posts: 4 | Registered: Wed April 02 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Gold Member - 25 or more posts
Posted Hide Post
To do any serious testing you need to have a VOA (Virgin Oil Analysis) done on the new, unused oil. This will give you a base line to compare your UOAs (Used Oil Analysis) that will come later. I've never seen either on Synlube so they would be very interesting.

I would recommend going with Terry Dyson: http://www.dysonanalysis.com/ It will be a little more than just getting samples to a lab(~$25 vs. $60) but you will get professional opinion by a man that consults with race teams, oil corps, and everyone else. You will get real information this way. Not just conjecture on a BBS.

You should note that what Synlube claims is against every accepted rule of engine lubrication.

quote:
SynLube is made of inert ingredients
And this is one of them. If this were really true then they would not be doing their job protecting the engine.

I look forward to your experiment though.
 
Posts: 31 | Location: Las Vegas | Registered: Mon November 05 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Bronze Member - 1 or more posts
Posted Hide Post
Thanks Tempest. Should I have analysis on my existing Mobil 1, VOA and UOA also?
 
Posts: 4 | Registered: Wed April 02 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Gold Member - 25 or more posts
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Doug_:
Thanks Tempest. Should I have analysis on my existing Mobil 1, VOA and UOA also?


For a real comparison between the 2 oils, yes. The same lab should be used for all samples since there is variation from lab to lab.
 
Posts: 31 | Location: Las Vegas | Registered: Mon November 05 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Gold Member - 25 or more posts
Posted Hide Post
Don't think it is needed, since Mobil 1 is a widely known product. Besides, Terry have all the numbers on unused Mobil 1 oil. By the way; Terry Dyson is one of the best, in what he is doing, so this would be a smart choice.
Tempest say that you should note that what Synlube claims, is against every accepted rule of engine lubrication.
Accepted by whom? The every day driver?

Let me tell you then, that in 1994, Ferrari had some issues with their transmission in the Formula 1. They solved their problem when they changed to Synlube.
Next season, they had a new transmission ready.
Do you think Ferrari would have been using an oil that is not accepted by the best motor and lubrication engineers?
I think not, but maybe Tempest know better than Ferrari, who knows?
 
Posts: 33 | Location: Norway | Registered: Mon October 01 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 ... 21 22 23 24 
 



© 2006 Noria Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Guidelines and Terms

Go to our old message boards.