Skip to main content

Read our primer articles on Oil Analysis and Tribology

I would like to add this test to the standard range of tests we currently carry out on turbine oils. I belive this test can detect the varnish potential of oils. Can anyone supply information regarding test method and instruments/software used? I don't think it's a recognised test but Kleentek use it to monitor progress of their electrostatic machines.
Frank
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Macabf
QSA test is provided by AnalystINC in USA. We have been using it in several gas turbines in Latin America (Mexico, Uruguay, Argentina), and we have had good correlation with the field. QSA isn't a ASTM test.

In the other hand, we use ISOPur technology for removing varnish (in Gas Turbines) according the recomendations of GE (TIL 1528-03). We haven't used Kleentek technology.

If you want more details (ej oil analysis reports, etc), please write to schmid@sicelub.com. This is my email.
Colorimetric analysis is the basis of the best varnish testing, used by us in our VPI (Varnish Potential Index TM) test. While the exact procedures are proprietary, it is probably similar to the QSA test and other "patch" type color measurements. Try reading publications from Dr. Sasaki, Kleentex and Greg Livingston...you should be able to figure it out with a little imagaination..
The QSA test is based on the colorimetric test. There is currently an effort underway in ASTM (D02, C01) to establish this as a standard. For the time being, Analysts is the only independent lab offering this test in the US and this test is a critical part of turbine oil monitoring. (Especially gas turbines.)

With regards to the GE TIL, there are many aspects of gas turbine varnishing that are omitted from this piece. The issue is more complicated than simply deciding between electrostatic separators, as is evident from dozens of gas turbines that are still experiencing valve sticking problems after the installation of these technologies. These technologies should be considered an essential part of the solution, but certainly not the entire solution.

Andy - sa wa dee khrap. thanks for the reference.
Thanks for the update Greg, in the meantime I'll be using the Ultra Centrifuge as the test for rating varnish potential, in conbination with RPVOT.
As far as the varnish removal goes, we'll either install CC Jensen filtration, Isopur, Kleentek, or a combination of both filtration and particle agglomeration. Anything has to be better than 20 micron nominal which what we have.
Frank
For everyones info, we have formally submitted our VPI method to the ASTM committee with no commercial strings attached, hopefully it can become freely available knowledge soon.

We are giving ASTM first crack at it, but if they turn it down, we are willing to share it for research sake, with anyone, as well, it is a really simple test and with low cost equiment (simple lab glassware, PC, scanner and photoshop) Big Grin

andy.sitton@focuslab.co.th
Also note my good friend Mark Smith's comments about the interpretation of the varnish test results,regardless of which test method is approved or employed, you are gonna need an interpretation of the results...the gravimetric patch still holds this key and what is seen under the microscope is still just as important as any number...independent labs are still where this expertise will be, by seeing so many different types of turbines with so many different types of oils...these "trained eyes" will still be the best root cause detection sources...Andy Big Grin
Hi Frank

I'm not trying to be a pessimist here...the test protocol that you've put together has value. However, the only test that will tell you anything about the varnish potential that you’ve listed is the UC test. You should never see AN's above 0.3 in turbine oils and RPVOT has no correlation whatsoever to varnish. (Lots of research available on this.) A much more valuable trending tool for you is the RULER instrument – an indispensable tool for turbine oil condition monitoring.

One other interesting note for you…

The average size of a soft contaminant (varnish precursor) in an operating turbine reservoir is 0.08-microns. When the system is not operating, many of these soft contaminants will agglomerate together and form particles with an average size of 1-micron. 3-micron mechanical filters will be of limited use to you with regards to removing soft contaminants.

Greg
A company in Fishers Indiana is offering a varnish test kit based on MPC per ASTM D02.C0.01 It has a spectometer included that takes a lot of the guess work out of comparing to a color chart. Other than that, I dont know where you would get the chart.

quote:
Originally posted by serendpidy:
We are operating gas and steam turbine and have been getting conflicting results from different labs for the varnish index. We would like to obtain the method and colormetric charts so we can do the testing in-house. Can anyone assist us. The laboratories we use wont give us the test methods so we cant compare apples with apples.
Post
attend Reliable Plant 2024
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×