Skip to main content

Read our primer articles on Oil Analysis and Tribology

I am new to fluid testing have a question about optical particle counters that I hope you can help with.
I am planning on using a LPC LCM20 to test automatic transmission fluid in fleets of vehicles with various models of transmissions which may have new oil of different types/brands as well as used oil. The purpose of the testing is to identify excessive amounts of harmful wear particles and/or verify cleanliness levels. One of our customers has questioned the validity of testing automotive transmission fluid with optical particle counters because of comments in a report from one of the major oil companies that is also their oil supplier. In addition to particle counting, the oil supplier used UC (ultra centrifuge) equipment to test fluid samples from the customer. The comments follow. . .
"It should be noted that optical particle count instruments are based on the disruption of a light beam. Any material that disrupts the light beam will be counted as a particle and not all of these will be abrasive particles. Certain lubricant additives, particularly antifoam, viscosity index improver and detergent additives can be read as particles by the counter under certain conditions. For this reason, lubricants with higher levels of these additives, such as most automotive lubricants, will exhibit higher particle counts than lubricants with lower levels or different types of additives altogether, such as industrial lubricants."
My main question is how much variability in results can be related to differences in the oil additives in automotive transmission fluids (i.e. different brands or synthetic vs. non) ?
And, is laser particle equipment (Parker LCM20) a valid method for identification of excessive amounts of harmful wear particles in the fleets described above.

Thanks,
Gregg (newbie)
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Michelle,
Thank you for your response. It has been suggested to supplement my testing with the filter pads. I will look into this further.
I think your reference to ‘screening’ appropriately describes what I am doing. To clarify, this is not a maintenance type inspection regime, rather I am doing follow up on vehicles (transmissions) that are being returned to service after prior failure and subsequent overhaul. While all have automotive ATF fluid, brand and specific fluid are not consistent or controllable. Additionally I am documenting contaminate levels in new OEM transmissions or transmissions/vehicles prior to any failure to use as a benchmark.
Initial efforts have provided apparently reliable results with good used units (prior to failure) and units with supplemental filtration having categorically lower contaminate levels and units after overhaul having far greater contamination (5 to 50 times greater).
I am confident with the results but as noted, the validity of my testing has been questioned and I am trying to formulate a response to support my efforts.
My main concern is to fully understand how much variability in particle counts I can expect in this family of fluids (automotive ATF) and whether any variability will invalidate my test results.
Thanks again.
Gregg
Very intersting project.
New oil is not clean anyway, would expect some variation in Particle count due to lack of care with oil change /top ups, more so than formulation variations. Don't think that particle count will pick up VI improvers as I understand these (and additives)are soluble in the base fluid( unlike silicon)
Had some experience in the past with PSV/coach transmissions in the UK where clutch debris was a major concern(metalic and non metalic debris)
Also laser particle counting has a major drawback with large debris blocking the sensors.
Post
attend Reliable Plant 2024
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×