Hi Robin,
To answer the second question first, the lubricant testing in and of itself is neither predictive or proactive. It is the usage of the knowledge gained from the analysis that drives the maintenance to be either reactive, predictive or proactive. If for example the analysis determines a parameter to be out of spec and the decision is taken to simply change the oil, then that is more reactive than predictive. If the same situation held and the decision was to monitor the condition to see what the change rate and consequences were then that would be more in the relm of predictive maintenance. If however a single parameter was out of spec and it was known that that parameter would eventually cause harm, the proactive approace would be to design out that condition from reoccuring.....
Back to your first question, is there value in a 1 month old sample analysis? The simple answer is that it is highly dependent on the application. If this is an application that from the time a condition can be determined (through oil analysis) and the failure occurs is around 1 month, or less, then the answer to your questions is clearly no. If however the point of detection and the onset of catastropic failure (loss of function) is greater than 1 month then there is still value to recieving the analysis 1 month after collection. I think you are starting to see a trend to this logic. You need to determine the type of tyical failures associated with the equipment. And then design your analysis schedule around the failure indicators.
hope this helped.
Alan