Water, Particle and Varnish Removal Technologies Available..

High voltages are not a problem. We have agency certified ATEX units as well as pressurized NFPA units and Nema 7 units. Give my office a call or an email for more information.

Hello q-love

If you want the most effective, least complicated and most cost effective system for removing and controlling fine particulate, water, and varnish you should check out the CJC filter separator. The cost of providing explosion proof equipment can get very costly with most systems, however, CJC requirements are minimal or we can supply the pump with an air motor and a manual water drain and avoid these major costs completely.

If the sodium is disolved in the water, coalescing will remove it with the water, dehydrating will leave it in the oil.

Each CJC element holds 12 -16 pounds of varnish - using 4 - 16 or more elements - do the math, thats a lot of varnish!

Dirt capacties are similar see photo

To see how effective CJC filtration actually is check out this case study
steam turbine

If you have any questions please email me at cjccanada@telus.net

Harv

Thank you all for your feedback, Actually we have decided to go for electrostatic purification unit, today we will have a meeting with their representative..

I will let you know about the updates later on..

Thanks again..

Here in SE Asia, we have one existing unit in a crude oil refinery power plant with 3 more on order, see the testamonial link http://isopurseasia.com/ISOPurSEAsia/14901.html

And we have 6 units in a large LNG plant in Sarawak, Malaysia, being commissioned at the months end.....

Regards,
AndySitton@ISOPurSEAsia.com

Which electrostatic unit did you choose?

The OILKLEEN unit, 300X Model..

I hope it will work this time..

Isopur is currently selling new MR units to a company that is replacing their Oilkleen units. They found their results were bad and the units were plagued with leaks. Call my office for more information.

Kleentek is our competitor, but we respect the work they have done in electrostatic cleaning above any other competitor. We feel our units are superior, but you would expect that of any company. The two companies use a different form of electrostatic cleaning. The primary difference is Isopur uses conventional filters for particle removal. The other companies remove particles inside their electrostatic device. In an Isopur machine, you change filters, not electrostatic chambers.

Isopur also has higher flow rates than the electrostatic cleaners, so our machines reach greater particle cleanup faster and we can overcome greater amounts of contamination ingress.

Much has been said in the press about ion exchange resins as a primary method of varnish mitigation. our customers have not had the results they expected using ion exchange alone. In several cases, the oil has been compromised due to a bad resin choice.

Ray, thats a great response, ISOPur has also done a lot for the varnish removal industry. We've found that improper media selection will result in immediate stripping of the additive system and may cause damage to the system. There are two patent-pending processes available that do this without stripping additives and the results are quite outstanding. Instead of taking months to clean up a system using electrostatic/agglomeration (and risk not actually lowering the varnish potential because the particles are in solution), it takes a few days. But, you’re absolutely right, improperly applying resin technology will cause more damage than good. If you’re evaluating a resin-based technology, ensure that you’re utilizing a patent-pending technology that has been proven to be safe on the fluid. Before I switched to this industry I was an end user for over 20 years. There have been a lot of false promises over the years that make my job very difficult. One thing to remember everyone, ask other users and demand a guarantee.

Jeffrey P. Chapin
Fluitec International
www.fluitec.com

If anyone is interested in a video on this please don't hesitate to contact me.

j.chapin@fluitec.com

Wow! I am amazed at some of the comments on this posting.

Ray - Just to clear up a comment you made about replacing an older model OILKLEEN system. I assume that you are not replacing the OILKLEEN GREEN MACHEEN series electrostatic filtration system, because no GREEN MACHEEN leaks. Period!

DAVE (davgel)- Obviously you have no clue what you are talking about and I recommend that you do some research before you make a statement like this. OILKLEEN does not use Kleentek technology, and nor did Kleentek invent the current OILKLEEN technology used in the GREEN MACHEEN electrostatic oil cleaner. OILKLEEN has 18 electrostatic fields that the oil must go through and Kleentek has only 1. OILKLEEN has a higher field strength and also uses a depth media in the electrostatic field for additional filtration. I assure you will regret making this false claim...we will be in touch.

The OILKLEEN GREEN MACHEEN 300X is our explosion proof system that has a proven track record in the Middle East. Check out these varnish stripping results for real varnish removal proof of performance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_FkV_SWETU