Skip to main content

Read our primer articles on High Mileage Oil, Synthetic Oil and Kinematic Viscosity

I read that straight 30 motor oil actually will test out as a 20w30 if you run it through the procedure for rating winter oils, and that therefore, a 20w50 is a SAE 30 base oil with viscosity index improvers (VIIs) added. Fascinating!

So then that makes me wonder what the other common multigrades (5w30, 10w30, 10w40, and 15w40) are based on. For example, maybe a 15w40 is really a SAE 20 with VIIs added and maybe a 5w30 is a SAE 10 with VIIs added. If those are so, then where the 10wxx oils fall would be quite interesting. I suspect they may be based in either SAE 10 or SAE 20 depending on the manufacturer. I guess the bottom line for me is I always thought the "w" number was a reasonable proxy for the base oil weight, but it appears to be not so, but that the base oil is acutually thicker than the "w" number. This would make sense since the "w" number was never meant to describe a viscosity, but to descripe pourability and later crankability. That the "w" grades are given a 100C viscosity on the API chart is only to define a minimum 100C viscosity they must meet. I am interested in any thoughts folks may have on this topic.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Interestingly, some common oils are actually marketed as meeting a lower standard than the are capable of with regards to viscosity.

Mobil 1 15W50 definitely pumps well enough in cold weater to be rated about 10W50. (I suspect that since they're marketing it as a replacement for dino 20W50, they thought that it would be more attractive that way.

I've heard, but not bothered to verify that Delvac 1300S 15W40 could be advertised as a 10W40, but since conventional passenger car 10W40's have a bad reputation in the diesel world, it is a marketing move.



There are a variety of methods to increase viscosity at 100c, or decrease it at 0c with additives. In fact I think that it is far to say that different companies take different approaches to hitting the viscosity range they want.


Another thought that is worth mentioning is that a good number of oil companies are actually just blending houses that buy their basestocks and additives from Exxon/Shell/etc. Examples of this would be Amsoil, and Castrol US. It is odd to think that somewhere there in an engineer at Amsoil looking through Exxon's basestock catalog figuring out what additve and basestck strategy to use!
This is interesting. You see, the base oil suppliers release only SAE 10, SAE 30, SAE 40 etc.. as thier finished product. Hence lube manufacturers have no choice but to play around with these viscosities ISO VG 32, 100, 150 cst etc.. and by far 100 cst is the most popular.

Additions of various multigrade packages ensure pumpability at lower temperatures, or make it behave as if it is a free flowing 10w or a 15w oil.

Hussam Adeni
The info regarding the origin of 20w50 oil was on the European Redline Oil web page. I emailed them with my question and got this interesting response:

"So, yes, a 10w40 has got a thicker base oil than a 10w30 - indeed a 0w40 should have a thicker base oil than a 10w30 - and therein lies the next problem faced by an oil purchaser: many high street blenders start with say a 5w20 base stock and then add viscosity modifiers (which thicken the oil at high temperatures) to make 5w30, 5w40 and 5w50 end products. Because the viscosity modifers break down much more quickly than the base stock after a few miles you are driving around with a 20 weight oil in the engine rather than the 50 weight you thought you had! A good reason for using Red Line which uses a minimal amount of viscosity modifiers."
Thats right. Most major oil company's start with a base oil with a lower viscosity index - and VI improvers build it up to a higher range. Hence they break down alot quicklier.

Good oils use better quality base oils (upper type two to higher type three) with higher VI's - and use different polymers to give more lower end range. The end result is that it hangs in better at higher ranges and won't break down as quickly throughout the service life.
Last edited by astrixstar
Actually its the bigger companies that generally cut costs - thier R&D spend millions finding ways to balance additive costs/base oil costs. Alot of smaller companies cannot compete on price so they have to compete on quality (unless they're a generic cheapo off the shelf brand). Just by following the guidelines and reccommendations of the additive companies (which develop the API specs) they can manufacture better grade oils.
Post
attend Reliable Plant 2024
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×