Read our primer articles on High Mileage Oil, Synthetic Oil and Kinematic Viscosity
...and after 500 posts, 26+ pages, and the bantering back and forth, the jury's still out on this product...
Will it ever be fully explained, identified, or known to the modern man as the miracle lubricant of the 20th century???
I love oil, but just not this one.
Will it ever be fully explained, identified, or known to the modern man as the miracle lubricant of the 20th century???
I love oil, but just not this one.
Will it ever be fully explained, identified, or known to the modern man as the miracle lubricant of the 20th century???
The answer to this question, is most probably; "NO".
Even if it was, there will still be many reasons for most people, to not use this oil.
Speaking for myself; this is the best oil I have ever used.
I am satisfied with it, and the small difference, it is making to my engines performance.
That's the reason why I use it.
I would never go back to use ordinary oil.
If I get a sudden urge to change oil, I simply do it on one of my friends cars.
I like oil, too
The answer to this question, is most probably; "NO".
Even if it was, there will still be many reasons for most people, to not use this oil.
Speaking for myself; this is the best oil I have ever used.
I am satisfied with it, and the small difference, it is making to my engines performance.
That's the reason why I use it.
I would never go back to use ordinary oil.
If I get a sudden urge to change oil, I simply do it on one of my friends cars.
I like oil, too
Just stop it!
quote:Originally posted by Otto34:
Just stop it!
Why don't you just carry your nay-saying butt back to BITOG where you're welcome.
I began using Amsoil back in 1994, way before synthetic motor oil was a mainstream product.
People told me I was crazy and stupid for believing that synthetic oil was any better than mineral oil. Look at the synthetic oil industry now.
Now I'm checking out Synlube for the same reasons I looked at Amsoil back then.
If people tell me that I'm stupid and crazy for believing that oil technology may have evolved yet again, then I'm very inclined to move forward with Synlube. I'm not ruled by fear and doubt. I'm very curious about many things in this world, and fear does not prevent me from exploring technologies. Enjoy your Pennzoil Platinum, suckers.
People told me I was crazy and stupid for believing that synthetic oil was any better than mineral oil. Look at the synthetic oil industry now.
Now I'm checking out Synlube for the same reasons I looked at Amsoil back then.
If people tell me that I'm stupid and crazy for believing that oil technology may have evolved yet again, then I'm very inclined to move forward with Synlube. I'm not ruled by fear and doubt. I'm very curious about many things in this world, and fear does not prevent me from exploring technologies. Enjoy your Pennzoil Platinum, suckers.
And I'd be more than happy to provide a before and after UOA for all you cowards.
Hello All, after a long-long time journey about this lubricant, i'm still waiting the test result from Houckster, He promissed on September 2008 will provide the test result but untill today we cannot recieve this.
thanks,
enoch
thanks,
enoch
I have no excuse. I've been extremely lazy. I'm going to try and get the sample in later this week.
quote:Originally posted by Houckster:
I have no excuse. I've been extremely lazy. I'm going to try and get the sample in later this week.
Houckster,
Are you running the same batch of Synlube that you had when you first posted in this thread back in Sep 2004?
Yes, the oil was installed in January, 2004. The gas mileage and performance are still excellent.
I am going to submit the samples sometime in the next couple of days. I drove all of 83 miles in February and have all but gotten away from driving. That's part of the reason, I haven't submitted the samples before now.
I am going to submit the samples sometime in the next couple of days. I drove all of 83 miles in February and have all but gotten away from driving. That's part of the reason, I haven't submitted the samples before now.
In over 5 years of arguments about SynLube just about anyone who had any doubts, could have used it in their application, and by now would have had an undisputable result.
You can see it for yourself:
See SynLube on YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gse25lO1uB8
Do you really think that FOX would go out of their way to promote a snake oil ?
The people who work in the news room actually used it for over 5 years before they were willing to produce an information spot on their CAR CONNECTION.
And the people show in it are actual customers, not hired actors.
But I am sure most of you will find someting extremely wrong with it anyway !
Miro Kefurt
www.synlube.com
You can see it for yourself:
See SynLube on YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gse25lO1uB8
Do you really think that FOX would go out of their way to promote a snake oil ?
The people who work in the news room actually used it for over 5 years before they were willing to produce an information spot on their CAR CONNECTION.
And the people show in it are actual customers, not hired actors.
But I am sure most of you will find someting extremely wrong with it anyway !
Miro Kefurt
www.synlube.com
A Question of "value"
If you buy AMSOIL, Mobil 1, or what ever and try to return even unopened bottle for a refund, you will find that once you bought the product the respective company does not want it back even if you offer it to them FREE !!!
But perhaps you have missed the SynLube GUARANTEE, that is, you can return the USED SynLube any time for full REFUND or CREDIT for the volume returned.
I.e. USED SynLube has value, that is unchanged by use !
So you do not need to go "forver" without oil change, some racers change the SynLube after every race (deffinitelly not necessary).
With over 400 racing applications, about 390 of them keep the use of SynLube as a big secret, OK with US as they have PAID for it the full retail price.
At the same time they sport VALVOLINE, LUBRAX, CASTROL and AGIP stickers and get paid thousands for having them on their vehicle.
They of course could use the sponsors fluids for FREE, but they rather WIN and get the sponsors MONEY and buy more SynLube !!!
Point is that no one has ever got SynLube from us FREE, everyone paid the same price.
So that is also the answer to all those from this post web that are asking for FREE samples to "test".
And when refused argue that it is the proof that SynLube is not any good !!!
Test anything all you want, and when you are finished with it send it back for REFUND, what could be better ?
The reson we do not GIVE OUT FREE stuff is simply this: If you get anythig FREE it has NO value to you, and thus you have no problem with throwing it away.
If you know that you will get your $100 or more BACK, when you return it, you will attach value to the product and treat it appropriately and suddenly every ounce is worth a dollar !
If you buy AMSOIL, Mobil 1, or what ever and try to return even unopened bottle for a refund, you will find that once you bought the product the respective company does not want it back even if you offer it to them FREE !!!
But perhaps you have missed the SynLube GUARANTEE, that is, you can return the USED SynLube any time for full REFUND or CREDIT for the volume returned.
I.e. USED SynLube has value, that is unchanged by use !
So you do not need to go "forver" without oil change, some racers change the SynLube after every race (deffinitelly not necessary).
With over 400 racing applications, about 390 of them keep the use of SynLube as a big secret, OK with US as they have PAID for it the full retail price.
At the same time they sport VALVOLINE, LUBRAX, CASTROL and AGIP stickers and get paid thousands for having them on their vehicle.
They of course could use the sponsors fluids for FREE, but they rather WIN and get the sponsors MONEY and buy more SynLube !!!
Point is that no one has ever got SynLube from us FREE, everyone paid the same price.
So that is also the answer to all those from this post web that are asking for FREE samples to "test".
And when refused argue that it is the proof that SynLube is not any good !!!
Test anything all you want, and when you are finished with it send it back for REFUND, what could be better ?
The reson we do not GIVE OUT FREE stuff is simply this: If you get anythig FREE it has NO value to you, and thus you have no problem with throwing it away.
If you know that you will get your $100 or more BACK, when you return it, you will attach value to the product and treat it appropriately and suddenly every ounce is worth a dollar !
Hey Miro, there are too many people in this World with their hand out looking for discounts and freebees. A good product is worth paying for.
Regards, Paul.
in Haliburton, ON Canada...
Regards, Paul.
in Haliburton, ON Canada...
The last information we've get feedback from you in Feb 23, 2009, and know April 23, 2009. more than 4 weeks but still no test result.
To Miro..
i see the link you send to this forum, but still not get the result and technical explanation why we must use your lubricant. I see your face in this video..hmm...
enoch
To Miro..
i see the link you send to this forum, but still not get the result and technical explanation why we must use your lubricant. I see your face in this video..hmm...
enoch
quote:Originally posted by Houckster:
I have no excuse. I've been extremely lazy. I'm going to try and get the sample in later this week.
Hi, enocha.
I think you can find the technical explanation to why it is an advantage to use Synlube at www.synlube.com
I find it quite amusing that after several thousand people have been using Synlube, and find the product is supurb, someone is still saying that it doesn't work.
Even though you cannot find a single USER, that have any complaints about it.
The results from the two cars(one diesel and one petrol) I have it in, is great.
Engine more quiet, a small gain in MPG, reduced oil consumption(some 70%).
I think this product gives you the best value for money, if you take into accoult all the costs about oilchanges(oil, labour, using your time etc.).
I think you can find the technical explanation to why it is an advantage to use Synlube at www.synlube.com
I find it quite amusing that after several thousand people have been using Synlube, and find the product is supurb, someone is still saying that it doesn't work.
Even though you cannot find a single USER, that have any complaints about it.
The results from the two cars(one diesel and one petrol) I have it in, is great.
Engine more quiet, a small gain in MPG, reduced oil consumption(some 70%).
I think this product gives you the best value for money, if you take into accoult all the costs about oilchanges(oil, labour, using your time etc.).
You can see the results of OFFICIAL California SMOG TEST results on our web www.synlube.com just click on the link to "Another car goes 84,245 miles without oil changes!"
Just tested yesterday and emissions are so low as not to be measurable ! Actually cleaner than NEW car at 4,000 miles !!!
No way to fake it as in California the car is hooked up to computer when on dynamometer and all the test data gets electronically transmitted to DMV. The mechanic is subject to $25,000 fine and up to 5 years in jail, if it is not done properly !
DO YOU belive the results ?
The car just turned 125,000 today and the test was done 4.24.2009
Testing OIL really in the scheme of things has no real value, but testing the CAR and it's emissions prove that SynLube works.
It really does not matter at all what is floating in the motor oil or what chemicals are or are not in it, if the car runs, performs and has emissions lower than a BRAND NEW vehicle, and that is after 109,000 miles on SynLube WITHOUT any oil changes.
AMSOIL, ExxonMobil, CASTROL and SHELL (in all its products brands - SHELL, Pennzoil, Quaker State, etc.) can not even compare !!
As big as those companies are they do not have a SINGLE vehicle test where the FTP (the only test recognized by Automotive Industry, CARB and EPA) was done over the useful life of the vehicle !
NOT A SINGLE SUCH TEST by OEM or OIL CO since 1975 ! (Why NOT ?)
But we have done it under supervision of AAA and with car from FORD, however the people at FORD that started the test lost their Jobs due to cost cutting at FORD and totally abandoned the car with AAA when "new" Engineers (paid less than 1/2 the sallary of the "replaced" ones) took over.
Fact is that SynLube lasts longer than most people's jobs in Auto Industry and sometimes longer that the Company that made the car....
Just tested yesterday and emissions are so low as not to be measurable ! Actually cleaner than NEW car at 4,000 miles !!!
No way to fake it as in California the car is hooked up to computer when on dynamometer and all the test data gets electronically transmitted to DMV. The mechanic is subject to $25,000 fine and up to 5 years in jail, if it is not done properly !
DO YOU belive the results ?
The car just turned 125,000 today and the test was done 4.24.2009
Testing OIL really in the scheme of things has no real value, but testing the CAR and it's emissions prove that SynLube works.
It really does not matter at all what is floating in the motor oil or what chemicals are or are not in it, if the car runs, performs and has emissions lower than a BRAND NEW vehicle, and that is after 109,000 miles on SynLube WITHOUT any oil changes.
AMSOIL, ExxonMobil, CASTROL and SHELL (in all its products brands - SHELL, Pennzoil, Quaker State, etc.) can not even compare !!
As big as those companies are they do not have a SINGLE vehicle test where the FTP (the only test recognized by Automotive Industry, CARB and EPA) was done over the useful life of the vehicle !
NOT A SINGLE SUCH TEST by OEM or OIL CO since 1975 ! (Why NOT ?)
But we have done it under supervision of AAA and with car from FORD, however the people at FORD that started the test lost their Jobs due to cost cutting at FORD and totally abandoned the car with AAA when "new" Engineers (paid less than 1/2 the sallary of the "replaced" ones) took over.
Fact is that SynLube lasts longer than most people's jobs in Auto Industry and sometimes longer that the Company that made the car....
quote:As big as those companies are they do not have a SINGLE vehicle test where the FTP (the only test recognized by Automotive Industry, CARB and EPA) was done over the useful life of the vehicle !NOT A SINGLE SUCH TEST by OEM or OIL CO since 1975 ! (Why NOT ?)
Could it be that the oil companys have tested vehicles, like you have, but the results were not favourable, so the results were not reported? Na, that could not be. The oil companys would never do a thing like that. Or would they...
Actually world is a rather small place and there are only few EPA accredited Laboratories that can condust the FTP testing, all their operators know each other and are members of SAE.
I was just at SAE Convention in Detroit this week and talked with about seven different people of which 5 did already know that AAA run tests for us last year and actually asked me if we plan to run another test at 125,000 miles and 150,000 miles.
That is $7,500 to $9,000 a pop.
Since FORD does not care about any result on any car over 70,000 miles, and we just did California Required SMOG TEST which mostly shown ZERO for emission results, I'd rather save the $7,450 as the California test is only $50.00 as is required anyway to maintain California Registration.
In another 2 years it will be 150,000 on the car, and may be then we may run another FTP just to maintain the "We are the only one's who EVER done this".
But by then the Crown Vic will be worth about $1275 by kbb.com estimate.
So even than I may think twice about it, that glory will either add two more lines to our website, or alternatelly we juat may buy 1/2 of another NEW test car for the FTP test not done money....
Genrally when any automobile is 100% out of possesion of the company for which the test is done that costs $1.00 to $1.25 per mile at todays prices.
New Crown Vic is about $30,000 and about $90,000 would have to be spent for the vehicle operation and another $30,000 for the FTP testing at various mileages.
That is about $150,000 and takes several years.
Reason that BIG OIL does not do that is that every 3 to 5 years API and ILSAC comes out with NEW specs, so esentially by the time you finish the test, the OIL you have tested is obsolete and no longer produced, and in many cases the OEM also no longer makes the car as well.
So what is the point ?
You prove that the oil (no longer produced) used in the car (that is also no longer produced) worked.
With SynLube we can afford to do this since the Motor Oil Formula has been SAME since 1985 !!!
The Reason we used Crown Vic was because it is the most popular fleet car in the World !
(Taxi, Police, and in Lincoln and Mercury versions also for Livery use)
I was just at SAE Convention in Detroit this week and talked with about seven different people of which 5 did already know that AAA run tests for us last year and actually asked me if we plan to run another test at 125,000 miles and 150,000 miles.
That is $7,500 to $9,000 a pop.
Since FORD does not care about any result on any car over 70,000 miles, and we just did California Required SMOG TEST which mostly shown ZERO for emission results, I'd rather save the $7,450 as the California test is only $50.00 as is required anyway to maintain California Registration.
In another 2 years it will be 150,000 on the car, and may be then we may run another FTP just to maintain the "We are the only one's who EVER done this".
But by then the Crown Vic will be worth about $1275 by kbb.com estimate.
So even than I may think twice about it, that glory will either add two more lines to our website, or alternatelly we juat may buy 1/2 of another NEW test car for the FTP test not done money....
Genrally when any automobile is 100% out of possesion of the company for which the test is done that costs $1.00 to $1.25 per mile at todays prices.
New Crown Vic is about $30,000 and about $90,000 would have to be spent for the vehicle operation and another $30,000 for the FTP testing at various mileages.
That is about $150,000 and takes several years.
Reason that BIG OIL does not do that is that every 3 to 5 years API and ILSAC comes out with NEW specs, so esentially by the time you finish the test, the OIL you have tested is obsolete and no longer produced, and in many cases the OEM also no longer makes the car as well.
So what is the point ?
You prove that the oil (no longer produced) used in the car (that is also no longer produced) worked.
With SynLube we can afford to do this since the Motor Oil Formula has been SAME since 1985 !!!
The Reason we used Crown Vic was because it is the most popular fleet car in the World !
(Taxi, Police, and in Lincoln and Mercury versions also for Livery use)
Thanks for the explanation, Miro.
