Dont worry miro i will enjoy building my jeep,and no i wont try your product,since the only people who should use it in your book,are people living in the perfect condition,perfect environment,new vehicle since anything over 100k is trash.The way you treat potential customer is unheard off,you are extremely rude and using multiple account to defend yourself is quite low.....and dont talk about car or truck when you know absolutely nothing about them,dont worry more and more people know about your scam and luckily with Internet the one who dont know will eventually.
Read our primer articles on High Mileage Oil, Synthetic Oil and Kinematic Viscosity
quote:Originally posted by vitual_mage:
Dont worry miro i will enjoy building my jeep,and no i wont try your product,since the only people who should use it in your book,are people living in the perfect condition,perfect environment,new vehicle since anything over 100k is trash.The way you treat potential customer is unheard off,you are extremely rude and using multiple account to defend yourself is quite low.....and dont talk about car or truck when you know absolutely nothing about them,dont worry more and more people know about your scam and luckily with Internet the one who dont know will eventually.
Vitual,why are you responding to Miro?? The last couple of posts were by me(captain kirk). If we are going to have any dialogue at all,you have to at least keep track of who made the last post,...and by the way,...it is you who is rude and abnoxious!! If you have never used synlube, you can't make any sound opinion period!!
Spend the next few years doing research on the lubricant and then you will not only be educated,but over 21 as well!!!
quote:Originally posted by Captain Kirk:
you will not only be educated,but over 21 as well!!!
Oh the irony......
The irony is that i work in a mine,tar sand.....where we making synthetic crude oil,we running the biggest truck in the world Caterpillar 797b,and even with the best oil recycling system in the world,they still have to do oil change every 500 hours....if a product could make these truck run longer then that ,believe me they would know about it and use it.
Miro i have a question someone just made my day with one of your vehicle on your site.
:1987 YUGO GV
He estimates the car had over 400,000 miles on it. But since YUGO odometers do not register over 99,999 and roll over to "zero" the odometer has been showing only 52,117 miles when the car was traded-in.We can add that to the rx7,the movie star on her hood and the 1.5l MK2 vw golf?
:1987 YUGO GV
He estimates the car had over 400,000 miles on it. But since YUGO odometers do not register over 99,999 and roll over to "zero" the odometer has been showing only 52,117 miles when the car was traded-in.We can add that to the rx7,the movie star on her hood and the 1.5l MK2 vw golf?
Capt K, did you just say that one cannot form an opinion of a lubricant unless it is tried frst?
Even a trained and qualified professional?
Even a trained and qualified professional?
Date Registered: Thu March 18 2010
Karma Title: Level 1 - 1 to 50 posts
When someone starts new identity every day, taht alone is suspect, when no e-mail or no name is given , even more so
Karma Title: Level 1 - 1 to 50 posts
When someone starts new identity every day, taht alone is suspect, when no e-mail or no name is given , even more so
Date Registered: Mon November 13 2006
Karma Title: Level 3 - 101 to 250 posts
Location: Maryland
Why did you join this forum?: For knowledge of lubricant issues
RobertC
On teh other hand people like you I do take seriously and for sure how can you form any opinion if it is not suppoerted by a fact ?
Can you with 100% certainity, that you are willing to bet your life on predict how a pizza will taste, without ever smelling it, seeing it or God no ! Tasting it ?
When it comes to lubes no amount of past experience can make you predict or understand anything that you have not used.
Especially when the lubricant is NOT liquid, but a colloid - there is entire science "colloidal chemistry" that did not even exist when petroleum lubes were used on locomotives.
Tribology as a science did not even had a name before 1966.
No one could buy SynLube privately before 1985 as it was classified as a "strategic material" and you had to get clearance from Department of Defense to use it.
If you have never seen a drop of it, then you have no basis to make any comment on the product itself you can only express your expert opinion on OTHER CONVENTIONAL LUBES.
And that is my opinion and belief based on fact....
Karma Title: Level 3 - 101 to 250 posts
Location: Maryland
Why did you join this forum?: For knowledge of lubricant issues
RobertC
On teh other hand people like you I do take seriously and for sure how can you form any opinion if it is not suppoerted by a fact ?
Can you with 100% certainity, that you are willing to bet your life on predict how a pizza will taste, without ever smelling it, seeing it or God no ! Tasting it ?
When it comes to lubes no amount of past experience can make you predict or understand anything that you have not used.
Especially when the lubricant is NOT liquid, but a colloid - there is entire science "colloidal chemistry" that did not even exist when petroleum lubes were used on locomotives.
Tribology as a science did not even had a name before 1966.
No one could buy SynLube privately before 1985 as it was classified as a "strategic material" and you had to get clearance from Department of Defense to use it.
If you have never seen a drop of it, then you have no basis to make any comment on the product itself you can only express your expert opinion on OTHER CONVENTIONAL LUBES.
And that is my opinion and belief based on fact....
There are only so many co-incidences
On Noria there is SynLube thread for over 5 years, yet every now and then 4 to 7 people that do not disclose their name, location or anything else, have the "same" objections, prose, etc.
and they ALWAYS all join in mater of days or hours of each other.
AND NEVER post anything to other threads !?
If that is not rather obvious that it is the SAME person, then voila !!!
It must be a conspiracy - and just try to get 5 to 7 separate totally different people agree on anything... and you will realize that the probability of such event is eclipsed by KENO win.
But of course I did know a woman once that claimed to have 3 split personalities.... but that is yet another story, nothing to do with Lubrication.
No one in 25 years that SynLube ahs been available to public in USA (initially only as OEM lube in BERTONE X1/9) has ever complained of any problem, NEVER
How many Sludged up CASTROL, MOBIL, SHELL engines can you find ?
VW, TOYOTA, CHRYSLER, - in thousands.
Why then would anyone put PENNZOIL, QUAKER STATE, SHELL, MOBIL, CASTROL, etc. into ANY vehicle after all there is documented proof that engines that used the stuff failed, and not just few, over 9,000 of them to date?
Someone must really be blinded by the advertising $$$ to not to even admit that has and is happening.....
And what abotu the 10 to 15% of oil sold in USA that is classified as API SA, where do you think that ends up ???
On Noria there is SynLube thread for over 5 years, yet every now and then 4 to 7 people that do not disclose their name, location or anything else, have the "same" objections, prose, etc.
and they ALWAYS all join in mater of days or hours of each other.
AND NEVER post anything to other threads !?
If that is not rather obvious that it is the SAME person, then voila !!!
It must be a conspiracy - and just try to get 5 to 7 separate totally different people agree on anything... and you will realize that the probability of such event is eclipsed by KENO win.
But of course I did know a woman once that claimed to have 3 split personalities.... but that is yet another story, nothing to do with Lubrication.
No one in 25 years that SynLube ahs been available to public in USA (initially only as OEM lube in BERTONE X1/9) has ever complained of any problem, NEVER
How many Sludged up CASTROL, MOBIL, SHELL engines can you find ?
VW, TOYOTA, CHRYSLER, - in thousands.
Why then would anyone put PENNZOIL, QUAKER STATE, SHELL, MOBIL, CASTROL, etc. into ANY vehicle after all there is documented proof that engines that used the stuff failed, and not just few, over 9,000 of them to date?
Someone must really be blinded by the advertising $$$ to not to even admit that has and is happening.....
And what abotu the 10 to 15% of oil sold in USA that is classified as API SA, where do you think that ends up ???
You really have lost it. You whine how there are people who only post in a synlube thread. Can you point out all the thread here you posted in?
I wonder if you realize that people tend to post in a thread that they have an interest in?
You're grasping at straws. Your persecution compplex is in full cry.
Why don't you post accurate, verifiable, data on this miracle product instead of this nonsensical gasconade of yours?
9,000 engines failed due to using oils of proven ability? List them.
I wonder if you realize that people tend to post in a thread that they have an interest in?
You're grasping at straws. Your persecution compplex is in full cry.
Why don't you post accurate, verifiable, data on this miracle product instead of this nonsensical gasconade of yours?
9,000 engines failed due to using oils of proven ability? List them.
Im a French Canadian ,i now live in Alberta and its quite obvious.Yes people join to stop your shady business ,you attacked so many people on different forum that some do take it personal now,sadly some people will believe your claim and they need to be advise about your scam.You look down on anything over 100 000k saying its trash,saying that Mazda engine are badly design and will destroy themselves without your magic oil,telling people to get rid of their Honda hybrid,causes after 30 000k the transmission will destroy itself...unless we use your product from the start.You telling people how we can judge without being a specialist,saying we are not engineer or scientist , well ill ask you how can you talk about other vehicle without being a mechanics?
No one could buy SynLube privately before 1985 as it was classified as a "strategic material" and you had to get clearance from Department of Defense to use it.
Explain to me why on your site you can find this then :
1983 BERTONE X1/9
owner Patty Warren, Las Vegas NV
Synner since 2/6/1984 @ 1,800 miles
1984 BERTONE X1/9
owner Elizabeth Doris, Jupiter Hollow, CA
Synner since 2/26/1984 @ 800 miles
1980 FIAT-BERTONE X1/9
owner: Steve Bell, Burbank, CA
Synner since 11/1979 @ 600 miles
1979 MASERATI MERAK
owner: Gloria Viederstein, San Francisco, CA
Synner since June 1980 @ 700 miles
1978 FIAT X1/9
Current owner Daniel Gotlieb, NM
Synner since 10/1979 @ 6,000 miles
No one could buy SynLube privately before 1985 as it was classified as a "strategic material" and you had to get clearance from Department of Defense to use it.
Explain to me why on your site you can find this then :
1983 BERTONE X1/9
owner Patty Warren, Las Vegas NV
Synner since 2/6/1984 @ 1,800 miles
1984 BERTONE X1/9
owner Elizabeth Doris, Jupiter Hollow, CA
Synner since 2/26/1984 @ 800 miles
1980 FIAT-BERTONE X1/9
owner: Steve Bell, Burbank, CA
Synner since 11/1979 @ 600 miles
1979 MASERATI MERAK
owner: Gloria Viederstein, San Francisco, CA
Synner since June 1980 @ 700 miles
1978 FIAT X1/9
Current owner Daniel Gotlieb, NM
Synner since 10/1979 @ 6,000 miles
quote:Originally posted by Miro Kefurt:
No one could buy SynLube privately before 1985 as it was classified as a "strategic material" and you had to get clearance from Department of Defense to use it.
....
Yeah, sure. Can you provide the verifiable evidence of that?
Here perhaps? http://www.globalsecurity.org/.../report/1988/JGA.htm
Here?
http://www.emporia.edu/earthsc...natalie/newindex.htm
They either worked for NASA, JPL, Boeing or Lockheed (or their spouses did)
As simple as that first USA user was NASA engineer and used it in his wife'd Rolls Royce
Also SynLube was then available freely in Canada to anyone, that is how Russians bought it for their space program applications, the use was only restricted in USA.
So if you are Canadian yuo coudl ahve had it in your vehicle years before any US "private" citizen could buy it at any cost.
SynLube was manufactured in Vancouver BC from 1966 to 1989.
Since 1989 it has been made in DoE complex in Mercury, NV (also know as Nevada test site or area 51, hence the alians always used it !!!)
As simple as that first USA user was NASA engineer and used it in his wife'd Rolls Royce
Also SynLube was then available freely in Canada to anyone, that is how Russians bought it for their space program applications, the use was only restricted in USA.
So if you are Canadian yuo coudl ahve had it in your vehicle years before any US "private" citizen could buy it at any cost.
SynLube was manufactured in Vancouver BC from 1966 to 1989.
Since 1989 it has been made in DoE complex in Mercury, NV (also know as Nevada test site or area 51, hence the alians always used it !!!)
BERTONE also used SynLube as OEM fluid fill (as an option) first vehicles were imported in November 1982 to USA.
It was sold as ITAL GTM (Graphite Teflon Moly)
and not as SynLube, our web also is rather clear about that, just read it.
It was sold as ITAL GTM (Graphite Teflon Moly)
and not as SynLube, our web also is rather clear about that, just read it.
quote:vitual_mage
So you are the one that got upset because you wanted to use SynLube in vehicle that has over 120,000 miles and we explained to you why that is not such a hip idea because the SynLube would be worth more than your vehicle !
Randy D - I know who you are !!! (now)
You really made my day,at least i had a great laugh,when you start talking about the NASA and such,never taught ill be so lucky to be Canadian.By the way the water pump in the VW are tough even if the impeller is in plastic,i use to be a big fan of VW and strangely,i never seen or heard about a water pump failing.....had windows falling down,electric problem,alternator,heater core but water pump ? Vehicle in these day in age have never been so reliable,but without your help we are all doom,sorry everyone,you cant keep your vehicle more then 5 year unless you use synlube .
No its not me,my name is Eric im Canadian we dont use miles but kilometer ....my vehicle is a wrangler jk 2009,the engine is currently at 30 000k,i expect him to last for at least 250 000k without any major overhaul.I have read on many post how you treat people with higher mileage vehicle....my past vehicle?
vw jetta 1990 die around 420 000k
Mazda rx7 mileage in unknown since the engine was from another vehicle and been rebuilt.
Toyota trueno ae86 engine was fine over 240 000k on it ....was just a stupid teenager and totalled it.
Toyota 4runner 1989,over 200 000 killed it in a river...did hydro lock the engine.
Chevy cavalier 1993 , did sell it around 170 000 k and last time i heard was still running.
No its not me,my name is Eric im Canadian we dont use miles but kilometer ....my vehicle is a wrangler jk 2009,the engine is currently at 30 000k,i expect him to last for at least 250 000k without any major overhaul.I have read on many post how you treat people with higher mileage vehicle....my past vehicle?
vw jetta 1990 die around 420 000k
Mazda rx7 mileage in unknown since the engine was from another vehicle and been rebuilt.
Toyota trueno ae86 engine was fine over 240 000k on it ....was just a stupid teenager and totalled it.
Toyota 4runner 1989,over 200 000 killed it in a river...did hydro lock the engine.
Chevy cavalier 1993 , did sell it around 170 000 k and last time i heard was still running.
quote:Originally posted by Miro Kefurt:
Date Registered: Mon November 13 2006
Karma Title: Level 3 - 101 to 250 posts
Location: Maryland
Why did you join this forum?: For knowledge of lubricant issues
RobertC
On teh other hand people like you I do take seriously and for sure how can you form any opinion if it is not suppoerted by a fact ?
Can you with 100% certainity, that you are willing to bet your life on predict how a pizza will taste, without ever smelling it, seeing it or God no ! Tasting it ?
When it comes to lubes no amount of past experience can make you predict or understand anything that you have not used.
Especially when the lubricant is NOT liquid, but a colloid - there is entire science "colloidal chemistry" that did not even exist when petroleum lubes were used on locomotives.
Tribology as a science did not even had a name before 1966.
No one could buy SynLube privately before 1985 as it was classified as a "strategic material" and you had to get clearance from Department of Defense to use it.
If you have never seen a drop of it, then you have no basis to make any comment on the product itself you can only express your expert opinion on OTHER CONVENTIONAL LUBES.
And that is my opinion and belief based on fact....
The plural of anecdote is not data.
Data data data.
Real, verifiable, trustworthy data.
quote:Originally posted by Miro Kefurt:
They either worked for NASA, JPL, Boeing or Lockheed (or their spouses did)
As simple as that first USA user was NASA engineer and used it in his wife'd Rolls Royce
Also SynLube was then available freely in Canada to anyone, that is how Russians bought it for their space program applications, the use was only restricted in USA.
So if you are Canadian yuo coudl ahve had it in your vehicle years before any US "private" citizen could buy it at any cost.
SynLube was manufactured in Vancouver BC from 1966 to 1989.
Since 1989 it has been made in DoE complex in Mercury, NV (also know as Nevada test site or area 51, hence the alians always used it !!!)
So, theft from a goverment facility?
I had to read it twice....i mean Now synlube is used in space ship to !Beam me up scotty,no wonder you using capitain_kirk as another nick name lol .I just realized i dont even need to warm people against you....you look like a fool without help!
Since 1989 it has been made in DoE complex in Mercury, NV (also know as Nevada test site or area 51, hence the alians always used it !!!)
Since 1989 it has been made in DoE complex in Mercury, NV (also know as Nevada test site or area 51, hence the alians always used it !!!)
quote:Originally posted by RobertC:
Data data data.
Real, verifiable, trustworthy data.
Something we haven't seen yet.
