Synlube

Do you remember your posting below 1 year ago..? and still nothing data?
enoch


Posted Thu February 19 2009 11:14 PM Hide Post
Hello All, after a long-long time journey about this lubricant, i'm still waiting the test result from Houckster, He promissed on September 2008 will provide the test result but untill today we cannot recieve this.
thanks,
enoch
Posts: 15 | Location: Jkt- Ind | Registered: Sat October 25 2008

Ignored post by enochca posted Thu February 19 2009 11:14 PM Show Post

Houckster
Level 3 - 101 to 250 posts
Posted Mon February 23 2009 07:24 PM Hide Post
I have no excuse. I've been extremely lazy. I'm going to try and get the sample in later this week.
Posts: 168 | Location: Atlanta, GA | Registered: Sun August 22 2004

Ignored post by Houckster posted Mon February 23 2009 07:24 PM Show Post

Allen Walker
Level 1 - 1 to 50 posts
Posted Mon March 02 2009 03:21 AM Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Houckster:
I have no excuse. I've been extremely lazy. I'm going to try and get the sample in later this week.

quote:

Originally posted by Houckster:

quote:

Well a UOA should put this to rest once and for all, we hope. I would think the report will be honest, and revealing. I have a feeling Synlube's spin masters will quickly go to work if they don't like the report. OTOH if Synlube's claims are in fact the truth then sales should go through the roof. But I know quite a few people who still wouldn't use it even if it were free. Reason being the attacks made by the shills on Bitog. Tough job building bridges that have been destroyed.

If you buy a quart of SynLube and submit it to Terry Dyson for analysis, there won't be much room for spinning. He's an acknowledged expert on oil analysis and I believe he has corresponded with Miro about his oil. Let us know when you submit the sample since you would be inclined not to believe the results if we submitted it.

quote:

Consider this Houckster: As I pointed out earlier, you own synlube, so it is to be expected that you say what you do.

What do you mean I OWN SynLube? I'm a customer and nothing more. I live in Georgia. If you can't tell the difference between my style of writing and those of Miro Kefurt, you haven't been reading very closely.

quote:

Originally posted by vitual_mage:
The irony is that i work in a mine,tar sand.....where we making synthetic crude oil,we running the biggest truck in the world Caterpillar 797b,and even with the best oil recycling system in the world,they still have to do oil change every 500 hours....if a product could make these truck run longer then that ,believe me they would know about it and use it.

Now would they know about it?? Have they already tested it and therefore would know? Every 500 hours?...what are they using now in the mining industry?? Best oil recycling in the world?? Really? It would last forever if that were true. What is it?? Do you mean by-pass filtration?? Centrifuge type?? Heated?? What is the main filtration doing? Top ups? etc.etc.

Let me just guess about the oil. It is probably someting of industry standard or mainstream stuff,..just a guess though. Most company heads use whatever is considered normal for that industry and what everyone eles uses in that particular industry. The standard! If they are happy doing that,so be it!! I don't always like standards because it's status quo. I look for new and better standards,..and why not.

quote:

Originally posted by Trajan:
You really have lost it. You whine how there are people who only post in a synlube thread. Can you point out all the thread here you posted in?

I wonder if you realize that people tend to post in a thread that they have an interest in?

You're grasping at straws. Your persecution compplex is in full cry.

Why don't you post accurate, verifiable, data on this miracle product instead of this nonsensical gasconade of yours?

9,000 engines failed due to using oils of proven ability? List them.

I (captain kirk),think you need to disprove what is already fact and all over the net. Look at all the re-calls and sludge issues. Why do you think these oil forums already exist. If oil was that good,there would be no issues/discussions anywhere. Why all the oil forums all over the net??

Why does almost every store bought oil claim to fight all the sludge issues,...just read the bottles. Common oils have many negative issues,and it's already proven. Do you ignore this?

It is you grasping at staws,..you have the persecution complex.

Kirk IIRC I read somewhere that you have no financial interest in Synlube. If you do then correct me, if not why bother fighting this lost battle? The whole thing is rediculous, no customer is this loyal. I see you getting battered on Bitog as well. Might be time to pack up and leave? It is clear no one is drinking your Kool-Aid.

Maybe a few qts of the magic oil was sold for VOA's due to these threads. Then we'll have some facts and figures in black and white for all the members to see. You know what they say about figures? Liars can figure, but figures can't lie.

AD

quote:

Originally posted by enochca:
Wow too ......only admint and you can edit this....

quote:

Originally posted by Houckster:
I do not know who was able to edit my profile on BITOG but I have corrected the information. I repeat, I do not live in Nevada, I live in Georgia. I do not own any part of SynLube and I am only a customer.

If you are going to continue to regard me as Miro Kefurt, I'll let you have the last word as I will see no possibility of any productive exchange.

LOL a conspiracy, 31,000+ members on Bitog and his info was selected to be tampered with to frame him. LOL Awesome entertainment, and it's free!

AD

quote:

Originally posted by vitual_mage:
Agree time to lock,but a part of it need to be keep ,so people can read it for future reference .

Lock it,..because you don't believe?? Don't want to believe.. Disregard all the proof!...Lock out the truth,and potential for more truth,more information............brilliant!!

quote:

Originally posted by Trajan:

quote:

Originally posted by Miro Kefurt:


No one could buy SynLube privately before 1985 as it was classified as a "strategic material" and you had to get clearance from Department of Defense to use it.
....

Yeah, sure. Can you provide the verifiable evidence of that?

Here perhaps? http://www.globalsecurity.org/.../report/1988/JGA.htm

Here?
http://www.emporia.edu/earthsc...natalie/newindex.htm

Hey Trajen,it would be rather refreshing iiiiiffff,....you could bring something to the table besides all the negative comments. Do you ever have something positive? I do not, after reading your posts believe you are really that skeptical. Come oonnnn!!! It's seems by now you are doing this just to be amusing and antagonize people. I hope you enjoy amusing yourself!!

quote:

Originally posted by Trajan:
This the most reasonable post, IMO, of this entire thread.

The days of thick oil aren't completely gone though. (BMW S54 engines for example.) But I doubt that any Z4M owner would use Synlube.)

The Europeans are using thick oil!! 5w-40. It is the 5w that pumps during a cold start. The 5w-20 is only for CAFE standards,..look it up,it's a fact.

quote:

Originally posted by Trajan:
Consider this Houckster: As I pointed out earlier, you own synlube, so it is to be expected that you say what you do.

He owns the product,if you read his posts. It's in his engines. I own product as well for that matter.

quote:

Originally posted by Trajan:

quote:

Originally posted by Houckster:

What do you mean I OWN SynLube? I'm a customer and nothing more. I live in Georgia. If you can't tell the difference between my style of writing and those of Miro Kefurt, you haven't been reading very closely.

for Houckster
Member #: 939
Title:
Total Posts: 9
Registered on: 01/28/03 08:00 PM

Add to UBB Buddies | Ignore this user | Add to Watched Users | Show User's Posts


About Me
Occupation: Owner of SynLubes4Life
Hobbies: cars, bicycles, reading, photography
Location: Reno, NV

Contact Info


I read just fine old boy. Your profile from BITOG. Do read the line in red and get back to me.

Wow! Trajen,..Are you for real!! The statement in red is indicative that he is using more than one of the total product line up!! It does not in any way state he owns the "company". If you didn't get that,...all the issues at hand communicating with you now makes sense. I see we have a lot of work to do!! Would you like to start at the beginning sir!!

When someone (you know who) denies to find on the Internet multiple evidence of TOYOTA and LEXUS and VW and CHRYSLER engine that dies from sludge and the fact that all the class action suits that had thousands of plaintifs WON money for the "class" then he to me is totally ignorant of the facts - just as all those I want UOA data are totally ignorant of the BERTONE, KIA, AAA, FORD and EPA test results on SynLube which exceed any API "licensing" requirement - he has to modify and fake documents to "prove" this or that, like that anyone who posts anything positive about synlube or claims to use it has to be ME !!!

SAD SAD SAD - get a life !!!

And change it every 3,000 miles or 3 months which ever occurs first as if you do not your life will deteriorate.....due to lack of maintenance!

Here's an easy question. Since you are ignoring the MSDS thread I have to ask here.

Why is the MSDS dated 3/19/2010?

Why isn't it posted at your site?

Why did none exsist prior to 3/19/2010?

And the same questions for the PDS, except change the date to 3/17/2010.

quote:

Originally posted by Captain Kirk:

quote:

Originally posted by Trajan:
This the most reasonable post, IMO, of this entire thread.

The days of thick oil aren't completely gone though. (BMW S54 engines for example.) But I doubt that any Z4M owner would use Synlube.)

The Europeans are using thick oil!! 5w-40. It is the 5w that pumps during a cold start. The 5w-20 is only for CAFE standards,..look it up,it's a fact.

So you agree with Big Bear on synlube then.

PS: Anericans use thick oil too. Or are you saying that all the S54 powered cars built and or driven here don't.

quote:

Originally posted by Trajan:
Here's an easy question. Since you are ignoring the MSDS thread I have to ask here.

Why is the MSDS dated 3/19/2010?

Why isn't it posted at your site?

Why did none exsist prior to 3/19/2010?

And the same questions for the PDS, except change the date to 3/17/2010.

Give him some time to edit the site, and change the date of the MSDS. The change should up shortly . Everything is on the fly with Synlube.

AD

MSDS date is the date the MSDS is printed or submitted to anyone, whch we did on a request of a customer, that is Federal Legal Requirement (of course you can not find that in your Internet savy search) and indicates approval as of that date, it automatically informs the buyer/user inder OSHA rules that MSDS is valid as of that date. Last time anyone legitimately requested MSDS was in 1997. MSDS is NOT a public document the only requirement is that it is supplied UPON REQUEST to people who may handle ship or use the product associated with the MSDS.

Every company in USA and especially Oil Companies also have disclaimer that does not warrant anything, since any MSDS is ONLY valid for the product as shipped as of date of shipment and no assumptions can be made that the product is the same if the dates do not match.

With all the objections you raise for CURRENT and THEREFORE the ONLY LEGAL MSDS as of Date of ISSUE (APPROVAL) just immagine the noise you would make with document dated in 1997 !!!

quote:

Trajan

ONCE again you have demonstrated your total IGNORANCE and lack of Respect and Understanding of US Legal Requirements.

You are neither customer, handler or user of SynLube, so you have NO LEGAL RIGHT to MSDS.

Also since 1996 United States Courts for the Ninth Circuit ruled that SynLube "formula" is a "trade secret" we are not at liberty to disclose anything to anyone that is not already a public information on our website.

Anyone violating such court order is subject to fines and or imprisonment.

So if you want a long vacation at a Federal expense, go ahead, make my day !!!

Decisions by the court (Federal District) are usually final, unless it sends the case back to the trial court for additional proceedings, or the case is accepted for review by the Supreme Court of the United States.

So if you want any more information you just have to take your case to Supreme Court, and that is it, period.

So no more requests for any information, you simply will not get it without Legal Brief to Supreme Court.

By now it also should have dawned on you, that you may be subject to "wire fraud" under Federal Regulations ....

When the men in black come knocking, be ready !!!

I always thought it was forbidden to sell a oil based product without a safety sheet...

MSDS background



Another thing Miro: please combine your replies in one post, no need to spread it over 4 posts, we have an Edit button for this...

SynLube is NON PETROLEUM - take time to find out about someting you comment on and know absolutely NOTHING about !!!

Also we are not in EU but in USA, rules are totally different, just like USA does not use "metric" system, they do not have the same Laws and Regulations like EU - USA just has to be different, even it it is the last enclave in the world to use Inches, Feet, Gallons, etc....

When ever I have used edit - as I do now - I have also been accused of tampering with my previous posts - yet another NO NO, and now YOU are recommending it !!!! .:[EM]:.

So resolve that conflict with Trajan and the others, has the "edit" prohibition been lifted ?