Skip to main content

Read our primer articles on High Mileage Oil, Synthetic Oil and Kinematic Viscosity

quote:
vitual_mage

Unlike TOYOTA, there is only one recorded and verified fatality that occured in YUGO, a woman that got blown off a bridge, but probably any light weight car would have fared no better.

NOT ONE ACCIDENT (CRASH) Fatality - The only car that in NHTSA statistics has "ZERO" as the blown off the bridge incident was not considered "road event" but rather was even by the insurance classified as "Act of God" !!!
quote:
Originally posted by Miro Kefurt:
quote:


Now you not only provide stories about fake 2007 BMW Z, now you have to resort to fake links as well to prove your NON POINT !

Now, where did we put that file? We either moved it or removed it. In the meantime, can we offer you something else on the menu?

OH they just had to remove it once they found you were reading it !!!

Quite a reputation you have built for yourself !!


http://www.cartalk.com/content...t-Cars/results5.html

Try typing yugo in the google bar on the page next time.

And what fake Z4 are you talking about?

And you still dodge the question about those so called "tests"

http://money.cnn.com/galleries...tionable_cars/2.html

Consumer Reports, in its review of the Yugo, called the car "hard to recommend at any price" and concluded that "you'd be better off buying a good used car than a new Yugo."

Q: What comes with every Yugo owners manual?

A: A bus schedule.

The Yugo had the 8th highest death rate, with “3.6 occupant deaths per ten thousand cars.” The car did not accelerate quickly enough.

Worth a read again. http://neptune.spacebears.com/cave/syn-tolo.html
Last edited by trajan
quote:
And what fake Z4 are you talking about?


Liar, which you are - has a common tendency to forget his own fabricated lies:

First you own FORD taht burns oil every 1,000 to 1,200 miles and next thing you have BMW

Then you know all about SynLube because:\

Originally posted by Trajan:
43 pages, and still, nothing beyond the shrill cries of the cult.

Young lady, perhaps you should try providing some reputable information. Yes, I know, you're hoping that your shrill cauterwalling will drown out that you have none. But you will fail.

I see you did not take my advice and peruse through your fellow cultist comments.

You see, my young child with much to learn. I don't need to use this to know it's crap.

The engine that seized because of this rotten oil on a neighbor's 2007 Z4 is all the proof I need.

****

Keep on your lies !!!

Or may be you need to read your own posts, so you will actually start believing in them.
quote:
The crash test of the yugo are enough to prove how safe they are.......


YES They DO !!!

Four NHTSA crash tests has been conducted with
YUGO GV. Three frontal and one side test. Results are
available in NHTSA database, as separate detailed
reports (in pdf form), and also as files containing digital
data from accelerometers. Main data source for this
analysis were NHTSA database and reports.
Three frontal crash tests are available for YUGO GV:
no. 896, no. 999 and no. 1074.

And of course I still have all the data, and if there is any doubt in your mind that the cars did not pass, then of course you are agian wrong !

EVERY VEHICLE SOLD IN USA MUST pass all the FMVSS before it can be offered for sale in USA, the fine for that is $25,000 per vehicle, or $16.4 million cummulative - the fine just now levied against TOYOTA for failing the FMVSS requirement that vehicle drops to idle within 1 second of the release of the accelerator pedal, on books since 1972.

SO we can argue forever, but this in not about YUGO, but about SynLube (which was used in the YUGO 45).

****

All I probably wanted to post I have already did, only to find that most people will not read it anyway, nor take time to understand, so any further responses to nonsensical questions unrelated to anything is simply not worth my time.
quote:
Yugo "comes with a 10-year or 100,000-mile warranty


The terms of the warranty were approved by CARB in 1984, and if you notice since Bricklin when he took over did not honor that agreement, YugoAmerica (not YugoCars) was prohibited from selling any vehicles in California in 1985 and 1986 - again READ THE BOOK and do not make assumptions from third party quotes in a book review that you did not read yourself.

In $1665 car or $1625 car (depending on the day since the $/Dinar exchange varied slightly on daily basis) the NEW Powertrain (engine/transmission/clutch) was about $425 and took 45 minutes to replace.

Dealer hourly rate in California at that time was $65 average - and when we "tested" certified US mechanics with simple trouble shooting techniques (like shorted sending wire for temperature sensor, of disconnected ground from instrument cluster or a headlight) the average time to FIND and FIX the problem was 3.2 hours !!!

Simply we have found that US mechanics were incapable to find and fix a problem, no matter how trivial, but could handle complete engine replacement with ease.

That is probably even more true today, but modern cars are not designed for 45 minute powertrain replacement, just see what is the labor time on changing clutch on FORD Focus !!!
And Finally this:

Search: YUGO (all years)
Search results: No results for YUGO

Results from NHTSA FARS Data base = No result = ZERO

FARS = Fatality Analysis Reporting System


SO the quoted claim:

“3.6 occupant deaths per ten thousand cars.”

Is yet another lie propagated by the parrot of fake and false statements

PS: There is not such term as "deaths per ten thousand cars".

The term used by Government agencies (local or federal) is:

Fatalities per 100,000 Registered Vehicles

And that again is used since 1966 - the Vehicle Safety Act.

So fabricators of false claims can not even get the TERMS correct, much less the data to support them !!!

If the stated claim was TRUE the FARS returned result would have been = 59
quote:
Originally posted by Miro Kefurt:
And Finally this:

Search: YUGO (all years)
Search results: No results for YUGO

Results from NHTSA FARS Data base = No result = ZERO

FARS = Fatality Analysis Reporting System


SO the quoted claim:

“3.6 occupant deaths per ten thousand cars.”

Is yet another lie propagated by the parrot of fake and false statements

PS: There is not such term as "deaths per ten thousand cars".

The term used by Government agencies (local or federal) is:

Fatalities per 100,000 Registered Vehicles

And that again is used since 1966 - the Vehicle Safety Act.

So fabricators of false claims can not even get the TERMS correct, much less the data to support them !!!

If the stated claim was TRUE the FARS returned result would have been = 59


Again and again, you 4 twits take the bait that Miro puts right in front of your noses. Stupidity has no limit as far as you simpletons are concerned. Are you under 20? Your language and sentence structure tells us that you left school early, or are still in high school, at best. Single digit IQs. Hung over from last night's tailgate party in the local gravel pit? Smashing beer cans on your foreheads to impress the girls? You guys are too dense to know when to quit. Keep it up. We love it. This game is over for you mud-slinging dunces when Miro makes his last post. Thanks for dropping by...
Post
attend Reliable Plant 2024
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×