quote:Notice the silence now about 5w-20 oil!! Now we can talk about 5w-50 synthetic with a pour point of -64 F.
Beautiful. Simply beautiful...
Read our primer articles on High Mileage Oil, Synthetic Oil and Kinematic Viscosity
quote:Notice the silence now about 5w-20 oil!! Now we can talk about 5w-50 synthetic with a pour point of -64 F.
quote:Originally posted by Miro Kefurt:
SynLube is NON PETROLEUM - take time to find out about someting you comment on and know absolutely NOTHING about !!!
?
quote:Originally posted by Trajan:
http://www.clubtitan.org/forum...dex.php/t-22432.html The following excerpt.
In summary, the iron levels are off the freaking chart. Levels like this usually indicate the start of a problem. Even is a new engine that is still breaking in.
Secondly, the TBN is absolutely horrible. How is the oil supposed to go much longer than this with just a low TBN?
This oil is supposed to be a 5w50 lubrication. Well, its not really much of a 50 weight anymore. It's nicely inside the spec for a 40 weight. And if it were still a 50 weight, the viscocity at 40 degrees would make it a 15w50. Instead, with everything combined, you have a 20w40. That's baffeling. The Viscocity Index supports this at a piss poor 142. Superior my @ss.
quote:Originally posted by .:[EM]:.:quote:Originally posted by Miro Kefurt:
SynLube is NON PETROLEUM - take time to find out about someting you comment on and know absolutely NOTHING about !!!
?
This rule is not only valid for petroleum based products, but all types of products containing a hazardous substance.
Be careful who you call stupid here, you might regret it.
quote:Originally posted by Captain Kirk:I think you have it quite the reverse. The synlube skeptics will be as usual, the spinmasters!!quote:Originally posted by ADFD1:
Well a VOA should put this to rest once and for all, we hope. I would think the report will be honest, and revealing. I have a feeling Synlube's spin masters will quickly go to work if they don't like the report. OTOH if Synlube's claims are in fact the truth then sales should go through the roof. But I know quite a few people who still wouldn't use it even if it were free. Reason being the attacks made by the shills on Bitog. Tough job building bridges that have been destroyed.
AD
quote:
PS: 0.7866% of vehicle on the road have less than 100,000 miles on them
200,000 miles is so rare that so far in all of USA only 96 people responded to request of pictures of the car+person and the ODO.
The delvac was not damaged,it was capped to prevent damage that UPS or whomever ships is known to do. You are not going to tell me you never received damaged merchandise from shipping. Besides,you seem to be reading into things that aren't even there as usual.quote:Originally posted by ADFD1:quote:Originally posted by Captain Kirk:I think you have it quite the reverse. The synlube skeptics will be as usual, the spinmasters!!quote:Originally posted by ADFD1:
Well a VOA should put this to rest once and for all, we hope. I would think the report will be honest, and revealing. I have a feeling Synlube's spin masters will quickly go to work if they don't like the report. OTOH if Synlube's claims are in fact the truth then sales should go through the roof. But I know quite a few people who still wouldn't use it even if it were free. Reason being the attacks made by the shills on Bitog. Tough job building bridges that have been destroyed.
AD
Dream on Kirk. Your fighting a battle you are not going to win, give up and salvage what little business you have left with Synlube. You clearly aren't selling any oil here. I just read on the other board you guys tried selling damaged Delvac-1, nice. Could that be the foundation of Synlube, damaged Delvac, and the backyard brew added to it? Just wondering.
AD
quote:Originally posted by vitual_mage:
I’m the first to admit my knowledge in oil is very limited, like everyone I grow up with the idea one brand was the best, and 10w30 was the only oil that should be use in everything. My concern here is to see someone with an obvious lack of mechanical knowledge; I would even add common sense…..any engine over 100k is a piece of junk…unless run with synlube obviously. Miro talking about fact, but yet still always use is own opinion when it come to the point, transmission don’t autodestruct, engine don’t fall apart after xxxx mileage because they where build after 1990.Plastic do make sense, its stronger more durable, and more easy to manufacture. Your opinion about ford, Chrysler or Toyota should be keep for yourself....Toyota transmission are not seal, they have a drain plug with a magnet,filter on fuel pump are perfectly fine and can last longer then the pump itself.anyway I know you will answer with your theory and I will put a quote from your own webpage “grow up”. You have been exposed, people don’t take you seriously and the way you acting…they never will.
quote:Originally posted by ADFD1:quote:
PS: 0.7866% of vehicle on the road have less than 100,000 miles on them
200,000 miles is so rare that so far in all of USA only 96 people responded to request of pictures of the car+person and the ODO.
My bet is between Noria and Bitog there are more than 96 people with over 200,000 miles on their cars. I think on Bitog alone there are 100 members with cars with 200K miles on them.
Also from looking at your business location I wonder if you'd make good on your warranty. Maybe the business location is on the Star Ship Enterprise?
AD
quote:There's a few at BITOG with 300K I think.I wouldn't put too much faith in what the US gov't defines as a clunker.Back when Pintos were going boom, they defined pain and suffering as worth $10,000. The jury in the Grimshaw case disagreed with that.http://www.amazon.com/Ford-Men...-Lacey/dp/0316511668Im sure Miro can look that up. But I'm still waiting for that link I asked for above.
quote:Originally posted by inHaliburton:quote:There's a few at BITOG with 300K I think.I wouldn't put too much faith in what the US gov't defines as a clunker.Back when Pintos were going boom, they defined pain and suffering as worth $10,000. The jury in the Grimshaw case disagreed with that.http://www.amazon.com/Ford-Men...-Lacey/dp/0316511668Im sure Miro can look that up. But I'm still waiting for that link I asked for above.
Some of you guys have to be dopers for sure. The link has nothing to do with your rant.
Pinto? My father had a Pinto. He loved it. I drove it from Toronto to Vancouver and back, with three passengers, AC on most of the way cuz it was stinker of a summer, pulling a trailer. I had to agree with my dad when we go back to Toronto that it was indeed a good car. It had over 150K miles on the odometer. Just used everyday, ordinary gas station 10W30 motor oil oil of the day...
Also, why don't you put any faith in what your US government defines as a clunker? You know more than they?