Skip to main content

Read our primer articles on High Mileage Oil, Synthetic Oil and Kinematic Viscosity

quote:
Originally posted by Sarge:
quote:
Originally posted by Tim Vipond:
quote:
Originally posted by Sarge:
I got tired of talking with you Tim so I went and had an intelligent discussion with one of my steers.
Unbelievable from a grown man. Just unreal.
I defer to the forum here. I tried to keep the subject matter to TallPauls original subject matter....but no...we all have to be trolled by Tim The Amsoil Nazi. "Where is the data on TCW3" "Here is the history of Amsoil" "Here is all the polished pig Amsoil marketing links"
Just unreal.
I just wanted to discuss TCW3. It was you and others who kept bringing up and asking about AMSOIL. I was just answering your questions. You don't seem very interested in discussing TCW3. Why is that?

You said "All I can say is we have documented well over 6 million miles in our volunteers automobiles since I began this experiment.
To date not one negative. So many postives from quiter fuel pumps to MPG increases to quieter valve assembly.
I do not defend nor sale anything. I just set it up and documented all of it."

So let's see your documentation...

It is all posted on the WWW. Have fun!
Where is YOUR documentation? Please provide.
quote:
Originally posted by Tim Vipond:
quote:
Originally posted by Sarge:
quote:
Originally posted by Tim Vipond:
quote:
Originally posted by Sarge:
I got tired of talking with you Tim so I went and had an intelligent discussion with one of my steers.
Unbelievable from a grown man. Just unreal.
I defer to the forum here. I tried to keep the subject matter to TallPauls original subject matter....but no...we all have to be trolled by Tim The Amsoil Nazi. "Where is the data on TCW3" "Here is the history of Amsoil" "Here is all the polished pig Amsoil marketing links"
Just unreal.
I just wanted to discuss TCW3. It was you and others who kept bringing up and asking about AMSOIL. I was just answering your questions. You don't seem very interested in discussing TCW3. Why is that?

You said "All I can say is we have documented well over 6 million miles in our volunteers automobiles since I began this experiment.
To date not one negative. So many postives from quiter fuel pumps to MPG increases to quieter valve assembly.
I do not defend nor sale anything. I just set it up and documented all of it."

So let's see your documentation...

It is all posted on the WWW. Have fun!
Where is YOUR documentation? Please provide.

I have heard Silvan Learning Center has opening in their reading and comprehension class Tim. You can contact them at your convenience.
Documentation of thousands of people discussing putting TCW3 in their fuel? You are high aren't you?
quote:
Originally posted by ADFD1:
Tim it was your shameless self serving Amsoil plug, just like 95% of your posts here plugging Amsoil that tossed this topic into the crapper. We were trying to discuss TCW3 and UCL in general, can we do that in peace without Amsoil plugs, ads, statistics, and history? You are turning people off to Amsoil big time!

AD

Amsoil is aware of Tim trust me. Gotta run...the car is here....off to Cayman....
quote:
Originally posted by Tim Vipond:
quote:
Originally posted by Sarge:
I got tired of talking with you Tim so I went and had an intelligent discussion with one of my steers.
Unbelievable from a grown man. Just unreal.
I defer to the forum here. I tried to keep the subject matter to TallPauls original subject matter....but no...we all have to be trolled by Tim The Amsoil Nazi. "Where is the data on TCW3" "Here is the history of Amsoil" "Here is all the polished pig Amsoil marketing links"
Just unreal.
I just wanted to discuss TCW3. It was you and others who kept bringing up and asking about AMSOIL. I was just answering your questions. You don't seem very interested in discussing TCW3. Why is that?

You said "All I can say is we have documented well over 6 million miles in our volunteers automobiles since I began this experiment.
To date not one negative. So many postives from quiter fuel pumps to MPG increases to quieter valve assembly.
I do not defend nor sale anything. I just set it up and documented all of it."

So let's see your documentation...


If you just wanted to discuss TC-W3, explain this then:

Tim Vipond
Level 4 - 251 to 500 posts
Posted Oct 14, 3:54 PM Hide Post
Why not use a product formulated specifically for your purpose such as https://www.amsoil.com/storefront/api.aspx?zo=1181889 ?

Not only is that NOT TC-W3, it is also, despite your claim, the first mention of Amsoil in this thread.

No one was talking Amsoil till you stuck your oar in.
quote:
Originally posted by Trajan:
quote:
Originally posted by Tim Vipond:
quote:
Originally posted by Sarge:
I got tired of talking with you Tim so I went and had an intelligent discussion with one of my steers.
Unbelievable from a grown man. Just unreal.
I defer to the forum here. I tried to keep the subject matter to TallPauls original subject matter....but no...we all have to be trolled by Tim The Amsoil Nazi. "Where is the data on TCW3" "Here is the history of Amsoil" "Here is all the polished pig Amsoil marketing links"
Just unreal.
I just wanted to discuss TCW3. It was you and others who kept bringing up and asking about AMSOIL. I was just answering your questions. You don't seem very interested in discussing TCW3. Why is that?

You said "All I can say is we have documented well over 6 million miles in our volunteers automobiles since I began this experiment.
To date not one negative. So many postives from quiter fuel pumps to MPG increases to quieter valve assembly.
I do not defend nor sale anything. I just set it up and documented all of it."

So let's see your documentation...


If you just wanted to discuss TC-W3, explain this then:

Tim Vipond
Level 4 - 251 to 500 posts
Posted Oct 14, 3:54 PM Hide Post
Why not use a product formulated specifically for your purpose such as https://www.amsoil.com/storefront/api.aspx?zo=1181889 ?

Not only is that NOT TC-W3, it is also, despite your claim, the first mention of Amsoil in this thread.

No one was talking Amsoil till you stuck your oar in.
It was a legitimate question. Why use TCW3 when the TCW3 manufacturers don't recommend it. Why not use products that were formulated for, tested, and have already proven for that application? I was hoping for a good reason, but none was given. Still waiting...
quote:
Originally posted by ADFD1:
Open your mind Tim think out of the box, try and learn. Join LS1 ask for a good reason why all those people are using TCW3, and with good results, then tell'em how you really feel! Plug Amsoil there, I'm sure they'd love to hear from ya!

AD


AMSOIL is already discussed there. I think there is an AMSOIL sponsor there. Very positive results. Good enough for me.

I got a response from the Pennzoil technical group:

From: pqsandcarcaretechnical-us@shell.com
Subject: Re: Pennzoil Synthetic Marine Full Synthetic 2 cycle oil in 4 cycle engines.
Date: December 13, 2010 8:34:45 AM CST
To: timvipond@comcast.net

Dear Consumer,

No matter what other people say. Do not use 2 cycle engine oil in a
4 cycle motor. You will cause major damage to your engine.

Regards,
Technical Service, sn
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 14:58:10 -0600 you wrote:

Do you recommend the use of Pennzoil Marine Full Synthetic 2 cycle
oil in 4 cycle gasoline automotive engines?

Why or why not?

It is being recommended and tested here: http://www.ls1.com/forums/
showthread.php?t=91206 .

Any benefits? Any drawbacks? Have you done testing?



[Inline text/html]
The way I read that it can be taken as (used in the crankcase instead of engine oil), and yes that will wreck an engine. It should have been asked if it could be added to the gas as a UCL. The legal dept would probably so no anyway. So the question IMO was worded wrong.

When you think out of the box you're on your own. The response was typical a of an oil company's legal response. Maybe they should try and ask the question again. My .02$

AD
quote:
Originally posted by ADFD1:
The way I read that it can be taken as (used in the crankcase instead of engine oil), and yes that will wreck an engine. It should have been asked if it could be added to the gas as a UCL. The legal dept would probably so no anyway. So the question IMO was worded wrong.

When you think out of the box you're on your own. The response was typical a of an oil company's legal response. Maybe they should try and ask the question again. My .02$

AD


I provided them the link where the discussion takes place about their product and the application.

Feel free to contact them with your questions.

I'm sure Shell scientists, like all scientists, "think out of the box" all the time.
Doubt they'll even bother with the link, the question was worded wrong, or intentionally worded that way to get a calculated response. Reading that question that answer is almost word for word how I would have replied.

Their answer doesn't matter to me, I know it works, I know MMO works, doesn't matter what I'm told. The LS1 forum just proves my point even more. Children ask questions a certain way to get an answer they are looking for. LOL

AD

Nice try Tim I see it was you who asked the question...................LOL
Guys, here is the scoop, our Amsoil Salesman named Tim Vipond, has been BANNED from Bitog and just about every other automotive forum.

He will say ANYTHING to push Amsoil and line his pockets with your money, all of Amsoil's so called tests are BOGUS since the lab that does there tests are owned by Amsoil.

I do not need any tests on either 2-cycle oil or MMO in the fuel since I know that it works and does no harm.

Tim has been laughed at on so many other forums as just another pushy Amsoil salesman.

Do any of the so called automakers recommend using Amsoil, or do they say that it is there factory fill.

Remember guys, when you listen to Tim, you need to realize that he is not a car guy, but he is really an Amsoil Salesperson.

Tim, worked on the fuel side at Shell, that is where he gets his pension, he is just shilling Amsoil for some extra money. He has absolutely no knowledge about MOTOR OIL's or anything else.

I am willing to bet that he was just a PAPER PUSHER for Shell and his credentials are really worthless for any discussion that we are having here.

Tim has a habit of jumping into threads just to push his own agenda, he cares more about putting money in his own pocket as opposed to what is best for us car guys.

I know many Amsoil salesman who feel that Tim is doing a disservice for the Amsoil brand name, the problem is that since he is an INDEPENDENT AMSOIL SALESMAN he can say what he wants and the sad truth is that as long as Amsoil is selling product, they really do not care.

I long for the day when Amsoil is sold at Wal-Mart and they get rid of worthless sales people like Tim who will say anything to push the product, until that time comes, then I guess we will have to keep reading Tim's wacky posts that just provide us with confusion with the hopes that we will buy Amsoil products.

All he provides us is with confusion, scare tactics, personal attacks on other products with absolutely no proof that these other products are harmful to our engines.
Having used both MMO and 2 cycle TC-W3 in the fuel, I lean towards the latter.

It does the same thing, and if you buy the Supertech, is cheaper to boot.

But, since it is not aimed at the 4 cycle market, of course they don't reccommend it. That doesn't mean it doesn't work.

And they will not do so. Probably because some bone head will either add a quart or more to his crankcase, or add that or more to his fuel. And seek legal action when he wrecks his ride.

Just like that bone head who ran the wrong oil in his turbo diesel way over the oci, and expected Ford to cover his screw up.
quote:
It does the same thing, and if you buy the Supertech, is cheaper to boot.

But, since it is not aimed at the 4 cycle market, of course they don't reccommend it. That doesn't mean it doesn't work.

And they will not do so. Probably because some bone head will either add a quart or more to his crankcase, or add that or more to his fuel. And seek legal action when he wrecks his ride.

Just like that bone head who ran the wrong oil in his turbo diesel way over the oci, and expected Ford to cover his screw up.


Good points. I think the % of people using it as a UCL is so small the companies making the stuff see little to no profit margin in it, so why bother marketing it. And yea the bone head who fouls his plugs because he used to much, will quickly cry foul. It's car buffs that think out of the box and experiment, and find things like TCW3 work well.

AD
quote:
Originally posted by TallPaul:
Since last April I have been routinely adding 1 ounce of 2-cycle oil (TC3W or whatever the high standard stuff is) to each 4 gallons of gasoline in my vehicles. I figure it is going to help lube fuel pump, injectors, rings (especially on start up when oil has drained off cyl walls), valves, etc. Also may help keep things clean. Any thoughts?


You're on the right track. TCW3 is the right one to use. It's ashless, thus catconv friendly.

It is a constant use thing though. But all that will happen if you stop is that your engine will go back to the way it was.

The ratio is right. Less will do no good. More, well at worst, you "might" foul a plug. Just drive awhile and top the tank off to restore the mixture..

I did look for the PZ brand. It's synth, and of course costs more,but couldn't find it. But all the reading I've done tells me that the Walmart Supertech works just as well. And it's much cheaper.

Also read that you should shake up the container before you use it as it kills the smell.
quote:
Originally posted by Trajan:
Having used both MMO and 2 cycle TC-W3 in the fuel, I lean towards the latter.

It does the same thing, and if you buy the Supertech, is cheaper to boot.


Just remember,the supertech has a good deal of solvents in the formula, and the 1 oz/5 gallons of gasoline was not based on the rather thin and dilute super tech stuff.


Someone will have to give some input on how much more to use in the case of ST....I would think 1.2 oz/5 gallons.


From Tim V.
[QUOTE] No matter what other people say. Do not use 2 cycle engine oil in a
4 cycle motor. You will cause major damage to your engine.


Well Tim if you're reading my response to Trajan....where are all those 'blown up' engines on all the forums including this one.......we talking 500:1---640:1 ASHLESS......GIVE ME A BREAK!

I go two steps further .......Acetone,Stabil(ethanal fix),and the fuel lube. WORKS BETTER THAN EVEN A PROFFESSONAL DEALER FUEL SYSTEM CLEAN,OR EVEN DOUBLE DOSE TECHCRON.........PEROID! This is done with every fuel up and it actually pays for itself...did the math!
quote:
Originally posted by Tim Vipond:
quote:
Originally posted by Captain Kirk:

Well Tim if you're reading my response to Trajan....where are all those 'blown up' engines on all the forums including this one.......we talking 500:1---640:1 ASHLESS......GIVE ME A BREAK!
You'll have to ask Shell Oil Company. That was their answer, not mine.



I have a better Idea Tim,let's have shell ask us... what the Real world data is,becuase we know better than they,becuase we live it!

For example,the drug companies don't have all the facts until people report back that a drug is good or bad to their doctors based on actual use......making us the last,and final 'study' of a new drug....NICE,ISN'T IT!

Have you noticed all the lawsuits with drugs being pulled off the market lately......even though they passed all the 'studies',and various hurdles to get in the market place as the final proof for my argument.

This reality also works with everything else in the market place including lubricants,hence all the constant change,recalls,etc.


I am sure Shell told you what they did only for legal reasons, not scientific reasons. After all,the data makes the only real argument!

In sum,adding 1 oz to 5 gallons of ashless two stroke oil in ones tank,will only do good,especially if you cycle MMO for a duration to vary and enhance the effect for lubricity and cleanliness, better still with top tier fuel.
As far as I can see, Amsoil 2 cycle oil is not TC-W3 certified, thus not suitable for cars that have cats.

Why would I pay $10.60, plus shipping, etc, for a 12oz bottle of that PI, when I can pay @$12 for the Supertech TC-W3?. For 128ozs.....

The PI is not cost effective. The ROI is horrible.

I can treat 42.6 tanks of gas on the ST. 3oz per tank. 16,800 miles on a gallon of ST.

The equivilent PI, since you use it every 4K miles, is a bit more than $42.40. Not counting shipping.

So I can either pay @$12 every 16-17K miles, or more than $40.
I'm not sure why you seem to want to go off subject and discuss AMSOIL, but since you want to:
quote:
Originally posted by Trajan:
As far as I can see, Amsoil 2 cycle oil is not TC-W3 certified, thus not suitable for cars that have cats.
No 2 cycle oil manufacturer says any 2 cycle oil is suitable for cars that have cats.

quote:
Originally posted by Trajan:Why would I pay $10.60, plus shipping, etc, for a 12oz bottle of that PI, when I can pay @$12 for the Supertech TC-W3?. For 128ozs.....
Beats me. I only pay $7.59 and no shipping for a 12 oz PI that is formulated for and proven in gasoline engines to:
• Improves fuel mileage an average of 2.3% and up to 5.7%
• Reduced emissions
— hydrocarbons (HC) up to 15%
— carbon monoxide (CO) up to 26%
— nitrous oxides (NOx) up to 17%
• Restored power and performance
• Reduced need for costly higher octane fuel
• Reduced noise from carbon rap and pre-ignition
• Better drivability
• Smoother operation

Supertech TC-W3 isn't.


quote:
Originally posted by Trajan:The PI is not cost effective. The ROI is horrible.
Actually, it is very cost effective. It is recommended once every 4,000 miles. 4,000 miles/20mpgX$3/gallon = $600. 2.3% increase in mpg = $13.80 saved in gasoline costs. My cost for PI $7.59. My savings is $6.21. My ROI is 83%.

quote:
Originally posted by Trajan:I can treat 42.6 tanks of gas on the ST. 3oz per tank. 16,800 miles on a gallon of ST.

The equivilent PI, since you use it every 4K miles, is a bit more than $42.40. Not counting shipping.

So I can either pay @$12 every 16-17K miles, or more than $40.
I pay only $30.36 per 16K miles for PI. And I save $55.2 in gas. And I know it works. ADFD1 and others found they got worse mileage, less performance with the TC-W3 that the 2 cycle oil companies do not recommend. Seems pretty clear to me.
Last edited by timvipond
Once again another Amsoil ad. Trajan TCW3 works. If you want a product better than the Amsoil PI get the Red Line product. It is also a UCL and can be used all the time @ 1.5 ounces/10 gallons of gas, if you desire a good cleaner and UCL. A great product from a great company. And their reps won't annoy you or anyone else by constantly pushing on these sites!

BTW Kirk's advise was good too! An example of thinking out of the box.

Got to love that Amsoil math, wow!

Seasons Greetings!
AD
How about it Tim any data to prove the PI is better? Not the B_S Amsoil sales hype, real data.

Once again you took a topic about TCW3 as a fuel system additive [which by the way many people are having great success with it] and turned it into an Amsoil pitch. Don't you realize a lot of guys are getting tired of the pitch? Read between the lines, it might help with your sales!

AD
The Redline SI-1 is an excellant product. Cheaper than PI too.

Amsoil doesn't make a TC-W3 oil, so I fail to see why Tim says that he wants to talk TC-W3.

Since this thread has fallen into another Amsoil uber alles pitch, I'm out. Like Zmax, use it don't use it, I don't care.

But this Amsoil nonsense has to stop. It isn't number one in anything. Not market share, sales, or use as factory fill.
quote:
Originally posted by Trajan:
The Redline SI-1 is an excellant product. Cheaper than PI too.
How is Redline SI-1 cheaper than PI, when Redline recommends adding in every tank of gas, and PI is recommended every 4,000 miles. Redline is WAY more expensive.

quote:
Originally posted by Trajan:But this Amsoil nonsense has to stop. It isn't number one in anything. Not market share, sales, or use as factory fill.
Again, not true. AMSOIL is number 1 in market share and sales in the extended oil change interval market. No other company is even close.
quote:
Originally posted by Tim Vipond:
quote:
Originally posted by ADFD1:
How about it Tim any data to prove the PI is better?
AD
YOU stated the Redline product is better than the AMSOIL PI. YOU provide the proof. The AMSOIL is one treatment every 4,000 miles. Redline recommends you add their cleaner in every tank of gas. Why bother with that?


I think what AD is saying is that he likes the Redline product better than the Amsoil PI, I agree with him since I have used both products, both AD and I do not have to provide any proof, our observations tell us to give our money to Redline as opposed to lining Tim Vipond's pockets.

I think Redline is recommending a maintenance dose of there product each time you fill up, remember Amsoil PI does not have upper cylinder lubricating properties like the Redline Fuel System Cleaner.

I personally use the Redline product once a year and then use MMO at each fillup for the Upper Cylinder Lubrication.

Tim, your sales pitch is getting old and annoying.
quote:
Originally posted by Tim Vipond:
quote:
Originally posted by Trajan:
The Redline SI-1 is an excellant product. Cheaper than PI too.
How is Redline SI-1 cheaper than PI, when Redline recommends adding in every tank of gas, and PI is recommended every 4,000 miles. Redline is WAY more expensive.

quote:
Originally posted by Trajan:But this Amsoil nonsense has to stop. It isn't number one in anything. Not market share, sales, or use as factory fill.
Again, not true. AMSOIL is number 1 in market share and sales in the extended oil change interval market. No other company is even close.


Give it up Tim, IMO it isn't what's cheaper, its what's better. Where's your proof that PI is better? Waiting, tick tock, tick tock!

Amsoil is champ of extended drain intervals, we aren't discussing that, and its getting old! Who cares? You remind us every chance you get! Hey Tim ask the Toyota owner who blew his engine following the Amsoil interval just what happens. I bet he'll follow the OM for now on! Then he took a junkyard engine for a replacement, he must have been the perfect customer. They got lucky there, trust me if were my ride they'd be swinging a new motor. I'm sure we'll hear more about blown Toyota engines and Amsoil, better hope everyone got those TSBs. I haven't seen or heard of any blown engines using TCW3, which BTW was the topic at hand.

Keep on pushin! You are turning people off in a big way! Looks like Trajan, Bear, and me to mention a few, I'm sure there are more.

FYI Bear there is no need to use the RL product all the time, you can if you want. It will keep your fuel system clean, and has the added benefit of a synthetic UCL. PI doesn't. BTW your method is a great way to maintain a fuel system, stick with it man!

AD
quote:
Originally posted by ADFD1:
quote:
Originally posted by Tim Vipond:
quote:
Originally posted by Trajan:
The Redline SI-1 is an excellant product. Cheaper than PI too.
How is Redline SI-1 cheaper than PI, when Redline recommends adding in every tank of gas, and PI is recommended every 4,000 miles. Redline is WAY more expensive.

quote:
Originally posted by Trajan:But this Amsoil nonsense has to stop. It isn't number one in anything. Not market share, sales, or use as factory fill.
Again, not true. AMSOIL is number 1 in market share and sales in the extended oil change interval market. No other company is even close.


quote:
Originally posted by ADFD1:Give it up Tim, IMO it isn't what's cheaper, its what's better. Where's your proof that PI is better? Waiting, tick tock, tick tock!
I never said AMSOIL was better. YOU said Redline is better. YOU made the statement, YOU show the proof. Still waiting....

quote:
Originally posted by ADFD1:Amsoil is champ of extended drain intervals, we aren't discussing that, and its getting old! Who cares? You remind us every chance you get!
Trajan cared. He asked. I answered.
quote:
Originally posted by ADFD1: Hey Tim ask the Toyota owner who blew his engine following the Amsoil interval just what happens. I bet he'll follow the OM for now on! Then he took a junkyard engine for a replacement, he must have been the perfect customer. They got lucky there, trust me if were my ride they'd be swinging a new motor. I'm sure we'll hear more about blown Toyota engines and Amsoil, better hope everyone got those TSBs. I haven't seen or heard of any blown engines using TCW3, which BTW was the topic at hand.
IIRC, it was the filter that may have failed, not the oil. That guy replaced his engine before he even spoke to AMSOIL. He filed a warranty claim and AMSOIL reimbursed him. He was quite satisfied with that.

quote:
Originally posted by ADFD1:Keep on pushin! You are turning people off in a big way! Looks like Trajan, Bear, and me to mention a few, I'm sure there are more.


AD

How can answering questions with facts and data turn anyone off? Just because I've challenged some statements, asked for data and provided facts? I thought that was what this forum is about.

Like Trajan says in his signature "Anecdotes are useful for stories and tall tales. To make decisions you need data."

BTW, AMSOIL's and my sales are booming. I have a few new customers from here. Thank you for your concern.
quote:
Originally posted by Trajan:
And yet, not a single European auto maker, on a continent where extended OCI is the norm, uses amsoil as a factory fill.
AMSOIL is made and marketed in the USA. Why would a European auto maker that manufactures, distributes and services world wide use an oil that is mainly only available in the US and Canada?

And why do you continually go off topic?
I provided RL data and facts Tim. Looks similar to Amsoil's so called facts. RL is a UCL too, we are talking UCL in this thread aren't we?

You are constantly spouting off every chance you get about how Amsoil is better, read some of the older threads Tim.

Glad business is good, stop turning people off and it will be even better. Smile

AD
quote:
Originally posted by ADFD1:
I provided RL data and facts Tim. Looks similar to Amsoil's so called facts. RL is a UCL too, we are talking UCL in this thread aren't we?

You are constantly spouting off every chance you get about how Amsoil is better, read some of the older threads Tim.

Glad business is good, stop turning people off and it will be even better. Smile

AD


You didn't provide any RL data and facts that supported your statement that Redline is better. If you want to retract that statement, then do so. Otherwise let's see some proof.
quote:
Originally posted by Tim Vipond:
quote:
Originally posted by ADFD1:
I provided RL data and facts Tim. Looks similar to Amsoil's so called facts. RL is a UCL too, we are talking UCL in this thread aren't we?

You are constantly spouting off every chance you get about how Amsoil is better, read some of the older threads Tim.

Glad business is good, stop turning people off and it will be even better. Smile

AD


You didn't provide any RL data and facts that supported your statement that Redline is better. If you want to retract that statement, then do so. Otherwise let's see some proof.


You're selling the product, prove otherwise. You wanted facts, I showed you RL's facts, prove otherwise. I've used both products I know the better one. Have you used the RL?

Remember I don't sell the stuff you do, so there is no margin in it for me. Why not stay out of these threads pushing Amosil and we won't stray off topic.

If you are looking for bogus 4 ball test results Tim, I don't have any sorry, or who gets whites whiter, none of those tests either. I have what you have, access to web pages, and the smarts to use them to make a decision.

AD
quote:
Originally posted by ADFD1:
quote:
Originally posted by Tim Vipond:
quote:
Originally posted by ADFD1:
I provided RL data and facts Tim. Looks similar to Amsoil's so called facts. RL is a UCL too, we are talking UCL in this thread aren't we?

You are constantly spouting off every chance you get about how Amsoil is better, read some of the older threads Tim.

Glad business is good, stop turning people off and it will be even better. Smile

AD


You didn't provide any RL data and facts that supported your statement that Redline is better. If you want to retract that statement, then do so. Otherwise let's see some proof.


You're selling the product, prove otherwise. You wanted facts, I showed you RL's facts, prove otherwise. I've used both products I know the better one. Have you used the RL?

Remember I don't sell the stuff you do, so there is no margin in it for me. Why not stay out of these threads pushing Amosil and we won't stray off topic.

AD
The Redline data you provided was last updated in 2003. It refers to leaded gasoline and MTBE. MTBE was removed as a gasoline additive in 2006 and replaced with ethanol. So RL data would seem to only reflect tests on gasoline that is no longer available. So your data is out of date and may not be relavent. Thus the formula may be out of date as well. The AMSOIL data was updated 10/10 and reflects current gasoline with ethanol.

Do you have any data showing that Redline is better than the AMSOIL fuel additive as you claim? Or just your anonymous anecdote.

I made no claim either way. I see no need to use Redline as they recommend using it with every tank of gas. Too expensive and inconvenient for me. Who wants to be measuring gasoline additives at every fillup (my wife sure doesn't) and then put opened containers back in the car? Yuck! And they don't have any current data showing how well it works.
quote:
Originally posted by Tim Vipond:
quote:
Originally posted by Trajan:
And yet, not a single European auto maker, on a continent where extended OCI is the norm, uses amsoil as a factory fill.
AMSOIL is made and marketed in the USA. Why would a European auto maker that manufactures, distributes and services world wide use an oil that is mainly only available in the US and Canada?

And why do you continually go off topic?


1: Said Euro cars are also sold here. In large numbers too.

2: Said Euro cars have long OCIs here too.

3: So again? Why isn't it FF for all the BMWs, Audis, Mercedes, RR, Bentleys, Ferarris, MINIs, ad infinitum, sold here?

3a: Do I really have to pull the list of Euro cars that use Mobil 1 as FF?

4: You would do well to keep in mind that it was YOU who took a thread on 2 cycle oil as 4 cycle engine fuel additive and proceeded to push amsoil. Again.

5: Again, what TC-W3 oil are you using in your car/s?
I'll email them Tim if I remember Monday, nice catch. I'm sure the product is even better now. I spoke to Dave their tech guy, about this product at great length. It is a cleaner that can be used once, like PI, Regane, or Techron, or for continued use at 1.5 ounces/10 gallons, and is a UCL too. The customer decides. But you don't believe me so what's the point?


Quick question, you'll know the answer. How many of these message boards were you booted from for plugging Amsoil, or annoying people looking to discuss a topic, shoving Amsoil down their throats? I know of one any others? In fact even the Amsoil guys on that site found you annoying. LOL

AD

Trajan is he annoying you too? This topic was all about 2 Cycle Oil as 4 Cycle Engine Fuel Additive. Then turned to an Amsoil shilling session, and now this. Cool!

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×